Literature DB >> 8472112

Improved assessment of supraclavicular and abdominal metastases in oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma with the combination of ultrasound and computed tomography.

H Van Overhagen1, J S Laméris, M Y Berger, H W Tilanus, R Van Pel, A I Klooswijk, H E Schütte.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate ultrasound and computed tomography in the assessment of distant metastases, supraclavicular and abdominal, in 113 patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastrooesophageal junction. Ultrasound and computed tomographic findings were compared with the cytological data in 29 patients and with the surgical data in 84 patients. In assessing distant metastases, ultrasound and computed tomography had a sensitivity of 61% and 70%, and a specificity of 93% and 85%, respectively (p = 1.0). When ultrasound and computed tomography were combined the sensitivity increased to 83% and the specificity decreased to 81%. There was no significant difference in the assessment of supraclavicular metastases (p = 0.8), coeliac metastases (p = 1.0) or liver and other non-lymphatic abdominal metastases (p = 1.0) on ultrasound or computed tomography. The results show that both ultrasound and computed tomography should be used for assessment of distant metastases and abnormalities confirmed by image-guided biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8472112     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-783-203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  11 in total

1.  Number of lymph node metastases determined by presurgical ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound is related to prognosis in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Natsugoe; H Yoshinaka; M Shimada; F Sakamoto; T Morinaga; S Nakano; C Kusano; M Baba; S Takao; T Aikou
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  W H Allum; S M Griffin; A Watson; D Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  [Preoperative evaluation of prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell cancer].

Authors:  P M Schneider; D Vallböhmer; J Brabender; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Present state of the Mini-Invasive Surgery (MIS) in esophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  J S Azagra; M Goergen; V Lens; J F Ibáñez-Aguirre; M Schiltz; I Siciliano
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Endoscopic ultrasound for preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  X Zhang; D I Watson; C Lally; J R Bessell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xue-Feng Leng; Yi Zhu; Ge-Ping Wang; Jian Jin; Lei Xian; Yu-Hong Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Staging of squamous esophageal cancer: accuracy and value.

Authors:  A H Hölscher; H J Dittler; J R Siewert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Staging investigations for oesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  E P M van Vliet; M H Heijenbrok-Kal; M G M Hunink; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Ultrasound of malignant cervical lymph nodes.

Authors:  A T Ahuja; M Ying; S Y Ho; G Antonio; Y P Lee; A D King; K T Wong
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Detection of distant metastases in patients with oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer: a diagnostic decision analysis.

Authors:  E P M van Vliet; E W Steyerberg; M J C Eijkemans; E J Kuipers; P D Siersema
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.