Literature DB >> 8471382

Studies of gastric content: comparison of two methods.

E Søreide1, J A Søreide, H Holst-Larsen, P A Steen.   

Abstract

In 20 patients studied under general anaesthesia, we found good agreement between gastric fluid volumes aspirated blindly and total volumes determined by fibreoptic gastroscopy (mean under-estimation 6 ml (22%); range 0-50 ml). Gastric fluid acidity measurements using an electronic pH meter and pH indicator paper also provided results with good agreement (mean difference in pH 0.1; range -0.3 to 0.5). As the use of a standardized blind gastric aspiration technique and pH indicator paper is simpler and provided sufficiently accurate measurements for clinical study purposes, we think this method is preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8471382     DOI: 10.1093/bja/70.3.360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  3 in total

1.  Ranitidine suspension or famotidine resoriblette and gastric fluid volume and pH.

Authors:  M Oikkonen; O Erkola; R Collan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Perioperative administration of caffeine tablets for prevention of postoperative headaches.

Authors:  K F Hampl; M C Schneider; U Rüttimann; W Ummenhofer; J Drewe
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Efficacy of Oral Transmucosal Fentanyl Citrate for Premedication in Patients for Surgery under General Anesthesia.

Authors:  Raj Bahadur Singh; Sanjay Choubey; Ria Mehra
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.