Literature DB >> 8467250

Impact of an HMO-based intervention to increase mammography utilization.

B Trock1, B K Rimer, E King, A Balshem, C S Cristinzio, P F Engstrom.   

Abstract

A health maintenance organization (HMO)-based program designed to increase breast cancer screening was evaluated, focusing on changes in mammography utilization. The program consisted of a multistage intervention aimed at women members and primary care physicians of the HMO. This report examines the effect of the intervention on mammography utilization. The program was evaluated using a quasiexperimental design in which a random sample of women aged 50-74 from the HMO (intervention) was compared to a similarly aged geographic control group selected through random digit dialing. From 1988 to 1990, 450 intervention women and 450 control women were sampled (without replacement) each year and surveyed about breast cancer screening practices and related knowledge. A clear increase in self-reported mammography utilization was associated with the intervention. The percentage of women who reported a mammogram in the 12 months prior to the survey increased from 41% in 1988 (baseline) to 68% in 1990 among HMO women, compared to a change from 39% to 49% among control women. Comparing postintervention rates of mammography in HMO versus control women yielded a rate ratio (RR) of 1.4. However, this effect was strongly modified by income and race. Women with annual incomes of $31,000 or more showed little (whites, RR = 1.2) or no (blacks, RR = 1.0) effect of the intervention. Among women with incomes less than $31,000, the effect among whites (RR = 1.9) was much stronger than among blacks (RR = 1.2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8467250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  8 in total

1.  The effect of Medicare reimbursement for screening mammography on utilization and payment. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

Authors:  N Breen; E J Feuer; S Depuy; J Zapka
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls.

Authors:  P M Lantz; D Stencil; M T Lippert; S Beversdorf; L Jaros; P L Remington
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Breast cancer in African American women: epidemiology and tumor biology.

Authors:  B J Trock
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: results from the Woman to Woman Study.

Authors:  J D Allen; A M Stoddard; J Mays; G Sorensen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Evaluating a tailored intervention to increase screening mammography in an urban area.

Authors:  Bruce Allen; Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Healthcare access, socioeconomic factors and late-stage cancer diagnosis: an exploratory spatial analysis and public policy implication.

Authors:  Fahui Wang; Lan Luo; Sara McLafferty
Journal:  Int J Public Pol       Date:  2009-12-28

7.  Racial differences in outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Jose M Pacheco; Feng Gao; Caroline Bumb; Matthew J Ellis; Cynthia X Ma
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Changing Health Beliefs about Breast Cancer Screening among Women in Multi-Ethnic Malaysia.

Authors:  Mila Nu Nu Htay; Maznah Dahlui; Désirée Schliemann; Christopher R Cardwell; Siew Yim Loh; Nor Saleha Binti Ibrahim Tamin; Saunthari Somasundaram; Michael Donnelly; Tin Tin Su
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.