Literature DB >> 8463905

Verification bias in pediatric studies evaluating diagnostic tests.

A S Bates1, P A Margolis, A T Evans.   

Abstract

Improperly designed evaluations of diagnostic tests may lead to inaccurate conclusions about a test's accuracy. One problem, verification bias, occurs if subjects are not equally likely to have the diagnosis verified by a gold-standard evaluation and if selection for further evaluation is dependent on the diagnostic test result. To determine whether verification bias is a problem in pediatric studies of diagnostic tests, we conducted a critical appraisal of all studies evaluating diagnostic tests published in three pediatric journals during a 3-year period. Thirty-six percent were subject to verification bias. The most prevalent cause was restriction of the patient sample to those whose diagnosis had been verified by a gold standard evaluation, when the decision to obtain the gold standard was influenced by the diagnostic test result. Verification bias may have serious effects on the estimated sensitivity and specificity of a test. Improved awareness of the potential for verification bias may help physicians improve their selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and thereby improve the quality and efficiency of patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8463905     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83540-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  8 in total

1.  Test characteristics of orthoptic screening examination in 3 year old kindergarten children.

Authors:  J-C Barry; H-H König
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Occult prostate cancer effects the results of case-control studies due to verification bias.

Authors:  Taro Iguchi; Ching Y Wang; Nicolas B Delongchamps; Robert Sunheimer; Tatsuya Nakatani; Gustavo de la Roza; Gabriel P Haas
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Uterine cavity assessment in infertile women: Sensitivity and specificity of three-dimensional Hysterosonography versus Hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Firoozeh Ahmadi; Zohreh Rashidy; Hadieh Haghighi; Mohamadreza Akhoond; Maryam Niknejadi; Mandana Hemat; Mansour Shamsipour
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2013-12

Review 4.  Bayesian Methods for Medical Test Accuracy.

Authors:  Lyle D Broemeling
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2011-05-05

5.  Optimizing Cord Blood Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Cutoff for Screening of Congenital Hypothyroidism-Experience from Screening 164,000 Newborns in a Tertiary Hospital in India.

Authors:  Praveen G Paul; Grace Rebekah; Sophy Korula; Manish Kumar; Joseph D Bondu; Raghupathy Palany; Anna Simon; Sarah Mathai
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-12-15

6.  Statistical methods to correct for verification bias in diagnostic studies are inadequate when there are few false negatives: a simulation study.

Authors:  Angel M Cronin; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic and prognostic serum biomarkers of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhongyu Liu; Yingchong Zhang; Yulong Niu; Ke Li; Xin Liu; Huijuan Chen; Chunfang Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluating developmental screening in clinical practice.

Authors:  Peter Dawson; Bonnie W Camp
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2014-12-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.