Literature DB >> 12812897

Test characteristics of orthoptic screening examination in 3 year old kindergarten children.

J-C Barry1, H-H König.   

Abstract

AIM: To analyse the test characteristics of orthoptic screening for amblyopia or amblyogenic risk factors (target conditions) in kindergarten.
METHODS: 1180 three year old children were screened by orthoptists in 121 German kindergartens. Orthoptic screening consisted of cover tests, examination of eye motility and head posture, and monocular visual acuity testing with the Lea single optotype test. Children were re-examined in kindergarten by different orthoptists after 3-6 months using a more demanding pass threshold for visual acuity. All children with at least one positive orthoptic test result or an inconclusive re-examination were referred to an ophthalmologist for diagnosis. The gold standard was set positive if a target condition was diagnosed on ophthalmological examination. It was set negative if no target condition was found upon ophthalmological examination, or if a child who screened negative or inconclusive passed the orthoptic re-examination without any positive test result.
RESULTS: The gold standard was ascertained in 1114 children. 26 (2.3%) children had a "positive" gold standard. In 10.8% of the children the initial screening was "inconclusive," mostly due to lack of collaboration. Screening test sensitivity (based on conclusive results only) was 90.9% and specificity was 93.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Orthoptic vision screening of 3 year olds in kindergarten is sensitive and specific. However, owing to a substantial proportion of inconclusive screening results, rescreening of non-cooperative 3 year old children should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12812897      PMCID: PMC1771738          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.87.7.909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  24 in total

Review 1.  Preschool vision screening: summary of a Task Force report. Behalf of the Maternal and Child Health Bureau and the National Eye Institute Task Force on Vision Screening in the Preschool Child.

Authors:  E E Hartmann; V Dobson; L Hainline; W Marsh-Tootle; G E Quinn; M S Ruttum; P P Schmidt; K Simons
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Use of Lea symbols in young children.

Authors:  M X Repka
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Preschool vision screening in Cornwall: performance indicators of community orthoptists.

Authors:  R P Wormald
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Preschool vision screening.

Authors:  S K Snowdon; S L Stewart-Brown
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine: Vision screening and eye examination in children.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Verification bias in pediatric studies evaluating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  A S Bates; P A Margolis; A T Evans
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Vision testing of young children in the age range 18 months to 4 1/2 years.

Authors:  D F Egan; R Brown
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.508

8.  Economic evaluation of different methods of screening for amblyopia in kindergarten.

Authors:  Hans-Helmut König; Jean-Cyriaque Barry
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 9.  Prevention of amblyopia and the concept of cure.

Authors:  J Sjöstrand; M Abrahamsson
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.922

10.  Comparison of the HOTV and Lea Symbols charts for preschool vision screening.

Authors:  R W Hered; S Murphy; M Clancy
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  13 in total

1.  The accuracy of photoscreening at detecting treatable ocular conditions in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Tammy Yanovitch; David K Wallace; Sharon F Freedman; Laura B Enyedi; Priya Kishnani; Gordon Worley; Blythe Crissman; Erica Burner; Terri L Young
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African American and Hispanic children ages 6 to 72 months the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in white and African American children aged 6 through 71 months the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Michael X Repka; Joanne Katz; Lydia Giordano; Josephine Ibironke; Patricia Hawse; James M Tielsch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Does assessing eye alignment along with refractive error or visual acuity increase sensitivity for detection of strabismus in preschool vision screening?

Authors: 
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Prevalence of amblyopia or strabismus in asian and non-Hispanic white preschool children: multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study.

Authors:  Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Susan A Cotter; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Ge Wen; Jeniffer Kim; Mark Borchert; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Test Re-Test Reliability and Validity of Different Visual Acuity and Stereoacuity Charts Used in Preschool Children.

Authors:  Diana Moganeswari; Jyothi Thomas; Krithica Srinivasan; George P Jacob
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

7.  The ophthalmic branch of the Gutenberg Health Study: study design, cohort profile and self-reported diseases.

Authors:  René Höhn; Ulrike Kottler; Tunde Peto; Maria Blettner; Thomas Münzel; Stefan Blankenberg; Karl J Lackner; Manfred Beutel; Philipp S Wild; Norbert Pfeiffer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Burden of Ocular Motility Disorders at a Tertiary Care Institution: A Case to Enhance Secondary Level Eye Care.

Authors:  Rohit Saxena; Digvijay Singh; Shiva Prasad Gantyala; Sneha Aggarwal; Murli Manohar Sachdeva; Pradeep Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

9.  Sensitivity and Specificity of Preschool Vision Screening in Iran.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Abbasali Yekta; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Amir Asharlous; Payam Nabovati; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.429

Review 10.  Effectiveness of screening preschool children for amblyopia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christine Schmucker; Robert Grosselfinger; Rob Riemsma; Gerd Antes; Stefan Lange; Wolf Lagrèze; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.