Literature DB >> 8463820

Effects of low-frequency stimulation of the superior colliculus on spontaneous and visually guided saccades.

P W Glimcher1, D L Sparks.   

Abstract

1. The first experiment of this study determined the effects of low-frequency stimulation of the monkey superior colliculus on spontaneous saccades in the dark. Stimulation trains, subthreshold for eliciting short-latency fixed-vector saccades, were highly effective at biasing the metrics (direction and amplitude) of spontaneous movements. During low-frequency stimulation, the distribution of saccade metrics was biased toward the direction and amplitude of movements induced by suprathreshold stimulation of the same collicular location. 2. Low-frequency stimulation biased the distribution of saccade metrics but did not initiate movements. The distribution of intervals between stimulation onset and the onset of the next saccade did not differ significantly from the distribution of intervals between an arbitrary point in time and the onset of the next saccade under unstimulated conditions. 3. Results of our second experiment indicate that low-frequency stimulation also influenced the metrics of visually guided saccades. The magnitude of the stimulation-induced bias increased as stimulation current or frequency was increased. 4. The time course of these effects was analyzed by terminating stimulation immediately before, during, or after visually guided saccades. Stimulation trains terminated at the onset of a movement were as effective as stimulation trains that continued throughout the movement. No effects were observed if stimulation ended 40-60 ms before the movement began. 5. These results show that low-frequency collicular stimulation can influence the direction and amplitude of spontaneous or visually guided saccades without initiating a movement. These data are compatible with the hypothesis that the collicular activity responsible for specifying the horizontal and vertical amplitude of a saccade differs from the type of collicular activity that initiates a saccade.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8463820     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.3.953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  19 in total

1.  Temporal interactions of air-puff-evoked blinks and saccadic eye movements: insights into motor preparation.

Authors:  Neeraj J Gandhi; Desiree K Bonadonna
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Saccade-related, long-lead burst neurons in the monkey rostral pons.

Authors:  Chris R S Kaneko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Attention governs action in the primate frontal eye field.

Authors:  Robert J Schafer; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Competitive integration of visual and preparatory signals in the superior colliculus during saccadic programming.

Authors:  Michael C Dorris; Etienne Olivier; Doug P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Subthreshold microstimulation in frontal eye fields updates spatial memories.

Authors:  Robert L White; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Motor selection dynamics in FEF explain the reaction time variance of saccades to single targets.

Authors:  Christopher K Hauser; Dantong Zhu; Terrence R Stanford; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Modulation of neuronal activity in superior colliculus by changes in target probability.

Authors:  M A Basso; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Saccadic probability influences motor preparation signals and time to saccadic initiation.

Authors:  M C Dorris; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  An integrative role for the superior colliculus in selecting targets for movements.

Authors:  Andrew B Wolf; Mario J Lintz; Jamie D Costabile; John A Thompson; Elizabeth A Stubblefield; Gidon Felsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Direct activation of sparse, distributed populations of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Vincent Bonin; R Clay Reid
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.