Literature DB >> 8461970

Some saccadic eye movements can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebral cortex in man.

A Priori1, L Bertolasi, J C Rothwell, B L Day, C D Marsden.   

Abstract

In 15 normal subjects we investigated the effect on visually guided saccadic eye movements of giving a single transcranial magnetic stimulus through a circular coil centered at the vertex. In the normal paradigm, subjects fixated a target which moved randomly to the left or right by 11 degrees. The mean saccadic reaction time of 189 ms was increased by 40-50 ms if a magnetic stimulus was given in random trials some 60 ms prior to the expected onset time of control saccades. The duration and amplitude of the saccades was unchanged. The delay was smaller if the stimulus was given earlier in the reaction period, or if the coil was moved anterior or posterior to the vertex. Larger stimulus intensities produced longer delays. Three subjects were trained to produce express saccades (mean saccadic reaction times of 107-141 ms) in a 'gap' paradigm. The latency of these saccades, which are thought to be mediated by collicular mechanisms without involvement of the cortex, was not affected by magnetic stimulation. This suggests that magnetic stimulation delays normal visually guided saccades by an action on the cerebral cortex, rather than on the oculomotor centres of the brainstem. Five subjects made non-targeted saccades in darkness in response to an auditory stimulus. These saccades, like visually guided saccades, could be delayed by magnetic brain stimulation. We conclude that saccadic delay is produced by interference with cortical areas involved in the execution of saccades rather than by interfering with the perception of the visual or auditory 'go' stimulus. These probably include supplementary and frontal eye field and posterior parietal cortex. The fact that visually guided saccades emerged intact after the delay indicates that the instructions for amplitude and direction were stored separately from those involved in timing when the movement was to occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8461970     DOI: 10.1093/brain/116.2.355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  14 in total

1.  Hemispheric lateralization in the cortical motor preparation for human vocalization.

Authors:  Y Terao; Y Ugawa; H Enomoto; T Furubayashi; Y Shiio; K Machii; R Hanajima; M Nishikawa; N K Iwata; Y Saito; I Kanazawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  A startle speeds up the execution of externally guided saccades.

Authors:  Juan M Castellote; Hatice Kumru; Ana Queralt; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of dorsal premotor area in reaction task: comparing the "virtual lesion" effect of paired pulse or theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Hitoshi Mochizuki; Michele Franca; Ying-Zu Huang; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Delaying forelimb responses by microstimulation of macaque V1.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Warren M Slocum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  C-H Juan; N G Muggleton; O J L Tzeng; D L Hung; A Cowey; V Walsh
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Dissociating the contributions of human frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex to visual search.

Authors:  Neil G Muggleton; Roger Kalla; Chi-Hung Juan; V Walsh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Similar prevalence and magnitude of auditory-evoked and visually evoked activity in the frontal eye fields: implications for multisensory motor control.

Authors:  Valeria C Caruso; Daniel S Pages; Marc A Sommer; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single and sequential arm movements.

Authors:  A Berardelli; M Inghilleri; L Polidori; A Priori; B Mercuri; M Manfredi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A step towards non-invasive characterization of the human frontal eye fields of individual subjects.

Authors:  Andreas A Ioannides; Peter Bc Fenwick; Elina Pitri; Lichan Liu
Journal:  Nonlinear Biomed Phys       Date:  2010-06-03

10.  Using fMRI to distinguish components of the multiple object tracking task.

Authors:  Piers D Howe; Todd S Horowitz; Istvan Akos Morocz; Jeremy Wolfe; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.