Literature DB >> 8458750

Differential effects of age on click-rate and amplitude modulation-frequency coding in primary auditory cortex of the cat.

J J Eggermont1.   

Abstract

Recordings were made from 185 neurons in the primary auditory cortex of cats in the age range of 15 to 297 days. A comparison was made between the tuning for click repetition-rate and for amplitude modulation-frequency of a noise burst on the basis of temporal Modulation Transfer Functions (tMTF). 90 of the 185 units had a clear band-pass type tMTF for both repetition rate and modulation frequency, there was, however, no correlation between the respective Best Modulation Frequencies (BMF). Amplitude modulated noise (AMnoise) was the more effective stimulus in young kittens while click-train stimulation was more effective in adult cats. For all neurons with significant synchronization, BMFs for both click-train and AMnoise increased with age from about 4 Hz in kittens younger than 30 days to about 10 Hz in adult cats. In the approximately 50% of the neurons that were tuned both to click rate and modulation frequency, however, the BMF to AMnoise was consistently and significantly higher than that for clicks. In this group the mean BMF for kittens younger than 30 days were 7.94 Hz for AMnoise and 3.29 Hz for clicks and in the adults 10.91 Hz for AMnoise and 7.71 Hz for clicks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8458750     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(93)90212-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Coding of sound envelopes by inhibitory rebound in neurons of the superior olivary complex in the unanesthetized rabbit.

Authors:  S Kuwada; R Batra
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Coding of amplitude modulation in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Jeffrey S Johnson; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Coding of FM sweep trains and twitter calls in area CM of marmoset auditory cortex.

Authors:  Yoshinao Kajikawa; Lisa A de la Mothe; Suzanne Blumell; Susanne J Sterbing-D'Angelo; William D'Angelo; Corrie R Camalier; Troy A Hackett
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Detection of gaps in sinusoids by frog auditory nerve fibers: importance in AM coding.

Authors:  A S Feng; W Y Lin; L Sun
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Reciprocal Interactions Between Audition and Touch in Flutter Frequency Perception.

Authors:  Silvia Convento; Kira A Wegner-Clemens; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.286

6.  Encoding of temporal information by timing, rate, and place in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Kazuo Imaizumi; Nicholas J Priebe; Tatyana O Sharpee; Steven W Cheung; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Syllabic (∼2-5 Hz) and fluctuation (∼1-10 Hz) ranges in speech and auditory processing.

Authors:  Erik Edwards; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.208

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.