Literature DB >> 8458140

The electrical stimulation of tibial osteotomies. Double-blind study.

G I Mammi1, R Rocchi, R Cadossi, L Massari, G C Traina.   

Abstract

The effect of electromagnetic field stimulation was investigated in a group of 40 consecutive patients treated with valgus tibial osteotomy for degenerative arthrosis of the knee. All patients were operated on by the same author and followed the same postoperative program. After surgery, patients were randomly assigned to a control group (dummy stimulators) or to a stimulated one (active stimulators). Four orthopedic surgeons, unaware of the experimental conditions, were asked to evaluate the roentgenograms taken 60 days postoperatively and to rate the osteotomy healing according to four categories (the fourth category being the most advanced stage of healing). In the control group, 73.6% of the patients were included in the first and second category. In the stimulated group, 72.2% of the patients were included in the third and fourth category. On a homogeneous group of patients, electromagnetic field stimulation had positive effects on the healing of tibial osteotomies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8458140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF)--results in evidence based medicine].

Authors:  Karin Pieber; Othmar Schuhfried; Veronika Fialka-Moser
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007-01

Review 2.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasonography versus electrical stimulation for fracture healing: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shanil Ebrahim; Brent Mollon; Sheena Bance; Jason W Busse; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields and low intensity pulsed ultrasound in bone tissue.

Authors:  Leo Massari; Gaetano Caruso; Vincenzo Sollazzo; Stefania Setti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-05

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 5.  Osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Reinoud W Brouwer; Maarten R Huizinga; Tijs Duivenvoorden; Tom M van Raaij; Arianne P Verhagen; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Jan A N Verhaar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-12-13

6.  Effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on human osteoblastlike cells (MG-63): a pilot study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Sollazzo; Annalisa Palmieri; Furio Pezzetti; Leo Massari; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Modulation of osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells by specific pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation.

Authors:  Ming-Tzu Tsai; Wan-Ju Li; Rocky S Tuan; Walter H Chang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Is there a role for high tibial osteotomies in the athlete?

Authors:  Bryan August Warme; Kristopher Aalderink; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  The impact of clinical data on the evaluation of tibial fracture healing.

Authors:  Bernadette G Dijkman; Jason W Busse; Stephen D Walter; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Biophysical stimulation in osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Authors:  Massari Leo; Fini Milena; Cadossi Ruggero; Setti Stefania; Traina Giancarlo
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.