Literature DB >> 8457813

Gender difference in anaerobic capacity: role of aerobic contribution.

D W Hill1, J C Smith.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate effects of gender on anaerobic and aerobic contributions to high-intensity exercise. A group of 38 subjects (22 women, 16 men) performed modified Wingate tests against resistances of 0.086 kg kg-1 body mass (0.844 N kg-1) for women and 0.095 kg kg-1 body mass (0.932 N kg-1) for men. The aerobic contribution to total work performed was determined from breath-by-breath analyses of expired gases during each test. Total work in 30 s was 30% lower (Student's t test; P < 0.01) in women than men (211 +/- 5 J kg-1 versus 299 +/- 14 J kg-1). Aerobic contribution was only 7% lower (P = 0.12) in women than men (53 +/- 1 J kg-1 versus 57 +/- 2 J kg-1). The anaerobic component of the work performed, determined by subtraction of the aerobic component from total work in 30 s, was 35% lower (P < 0.01) in women than men (158 +/- 5 J kg-1 versus 242 +/- 15 J kg-1). It is concluded that, because women provide a relatively higher (P < 0.01) portion of the energy for a 30-s test aerobically than men (25% versus 20%), total work during a Wingate test actually underestimates the gender difference in anaerobic capacity between women and men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8457813      PMCID: PMC1332107          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.27.1.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  23 in total

1.  Anaerobic capacity determined by maximal accumulated O2 deficit.

Authors:  J I Medbø; A C Mohn; I Tabata; R Bahr; O Vaage; O M Sejersted
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1988-01

2.  Kinetics of VO2 with impulse and step exercise in humans.

Authors:  R L Hughson; D L Sherrill; G D Swanson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1988-01

3.  Performance during the Wingate anaerobic test and muscle morphology in males and females.

Authors:  E A Froese; M E Houston
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 4.  Standard anaerobic exercise tests.

Authors:  H Vandewalle; G Pérès; H Monod
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity.

Authors:  O Bar-Or
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  The efficiency of human movement--a statement of the problem.

Authors:  P R Cavanagh; R Kram
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Determination of resistance settings for anaerobic power testing.

Authors:  J A Evans; H A Quinney
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1981-06

8.  Comparative anaerobic power of men and women.

Authors:  M M Murphy; J F Patton; F A Frederick
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1986-07

9.  Parameters of ventilatory and gas exchange dynamics during exercise.

Authors:  B J Whipp; S A Ward; N Lamarra; J A Davis; K Wasserman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1982-06

10.  Estimate of mean tissue O2 consumption at onset of exercise in males.

Authors:  M D Inman; R L Hughson; K H Weisiger; G D Swanson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1987-10
View more
  13 in total

1.  Mechanical work accounts for sex differences in fatigue during repeated sprints.

Authors:  François Billaut; David J Bishop
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Comparison of arterial lactate levels during sevoflurane versus spinal anesthesia in elderly females undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Park; Kyung Cheon Lee; Woon Rak Son; Ji Sung Lee; Youn Yi Jo
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  The measurement of maximal (anaerobic) power output on a cycle ergometer: a critical review.

Authors:  Tarak Driss; Henry Vandewalle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Sex differences in drug addiction and response to exercise intervention: From human to animal studies.

Authors:  Yuehui Zhou; Min Zhao; Chenglin Zhou; Rena Li
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 8.606

5.  Gender differences in power production, energetic capacity and efficiency of elite cross‑country skiers during whole‑body, upper‑body, and arm poling.

Authors:  Ann Magdalen Hegge; Elias Bucher; Gertjan Ettema; Oliver Faude; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Øyvind Sandbakk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Creatine supplementation and swim performance: a brief review.

Authors:  Melissa J Hopwood; Kenneth Graham; Kieron B Rooney
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 7.  Muscle fatigue in males and females during multiple-sprint exercise.

Authors:  François Billaut; David Bishop
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Role of muscle mass on sprint performance: gender differences?

Authors:  Jorge Perez-Gomez; German Vicente Rodriguez; Ignacio Ara; Hugo Olmedillas; Javier Chavarren; Juan Jose González-Henriquez; Cecilia Dorado; José A L Calbet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Physiological and health-related adaptations to low-volume interval training: influences of nutrition and sex.

Authors:  Martin J Gibala; Jenna B Gillen; Michael E Percival
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Anaerobic and aerobic performance of elite female and male snowboarders.

Authors:  Aleksandra Zebrowska; Dorota Zyła; Damian Kania; Józef Langfort
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.