Literature DB >> 3741284

Comparative anaerobic power of men and women.

M M Murphy, J F Patton, F A Frederick.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in anaerobic power (AnP) between men and women and the contribution of anthropometric variables in accounting for these differences. There were 18 female and 19 male subjects who performed the 30-s Wingate test where power outputs in watts are expressed as mean power (MP, the mean for 30 s) and peak power (PP, the highest 5-s interval). Thigh volume (TV), lean body mass (LBM) and body weight (BW) were used as anthropometric variables. Absolute AnP of men was 35% and 40% higher (p less than 0.001) than that of women for PP and MP, respectively. These differences decreased to 10% and 17% for PP and MP when expressed relative to kg LBM. Anthropometric variables explained less than 50% of the variation in PP and MP for men, while in women, TV accounted for 66% and 71% of the variation in PP and MP, respectively. When the data were combined, TV, BW, and LBM explained 48%, 74%, and 79% of variation in MP and 53%, 71%, and 76% in PP, respectively. These data show that gender differences in indices of AnP are similar to those reported for muscular strength and aerobic power. Additionally, a larger portion of the between gender variation compared to the within gender variation in AnP can be accounted for by anthropometric variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3741284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med        ISSN: 0095-6562


  8 in total

1.  Cross-validation of the 20- versus 30-s Wingate anaerobic test.

Authors:  C Matthew Laurent; Michael C Meyers; Clay A Robinson; J Matt Green
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  The measurement of maximal (anaerobic) power output on a cycle ergometer: a critical review.

Authors:  Tarak Driss; Henry Vandewalle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations.

Authors:  Yoram Epstein; Ran Yanovich; Daniel S Moran; Yuval Heled
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Gender Differences and the Influence of Body Composition on Land and Pool-Based Assessments of Anaerobic Power and Capacity.

Authors:  Jacquelyn N Zera; Elizabeth F Nagle; Emma Connell; Erin Curtin; Wilmina Marget; Anna P Simonson; Takashi Nagai; John Abt; Scott Lephart
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Gender difference in anaerobic capacity: role of aerobic contribution.

Authors:  D W Hill; J C Smith
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  Muscle fatigue in males and females during multiple-sprint exercise.

Authors:  François Billaut; David Bishop
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  LBNP exercise protects aerobic capacity and sprint speed of female twins during 30 days of bed rest.

Authors:  Stuart M C Lee; Suzanne M Schneider; Wanda L Boda; Donald E Watenpaugh; Brandon R Macias; R Scott Meyer; Alan R Hargens
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-12-26

8.  Sex difference in race performance and age of peak performance in the Ironman Triathlon World Championship from 1983 to 2012.

Authors:  Christoph A Rüst; Beat Knechtle; Thomas Rosemann; Romuald Lepers
Journal:  Extrem Physiol Med       Date:  2012-12-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.