Literature DB >> 8456756

Rotational coronary atherectomy after unsuccessful coronary balloon angioplasty.

W C Brogan1, J J Popma, A D Pichard, L F Satler, K M Kent, G S Mintz, M B Leon.   

Abstract

The clinical and angiographic outcome of patients undergoing rotational coronary atherectomy after unsuccessful balloon angioplasty was evaluated using quantitative angiographic methods to provide insight into this procedure's mechanism of benefit. During the study period, 41 patients (50 lesions) were referred for rotational atherectomy after standard balloon angioplasty was unsuccessful. After rotational atherectomy, percent diameter stenosis was reduced from 72 +/- 14% to 41 +/- 16% (p < 0.001); adjunct balloon angioplasty was performed in 44 lesions (88%), resulting in a 25 +/- 17% final diameter stenosis (p < 0.001). The acute gain in minimal lumen diameter was 1.20 +/- 0.59 mm. In lesions needing adjunct balloon dilatation, lesion stretch was 73 +/- 27%, and elastic recoil was 22 +/- 18%, with no variation by etiology of the initial balloon failure. Overall angiographic success (< 50% residual diameter stenosis) was obtained in 49 lesions (98%). Procedural success, defined as < 50% residual diameter stenosis and the absence of major in-hospital complications (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction or emergency bypass surgery), was obtained in 37 of 41 procedures (90%); complications developed in 3 patients (7%), including 2 who needed emergency bypass surgery after development of delayed abrupt closure. It is concluded that rotational coronary atherectomy may be used in selected patients when standard balloon angioplasty is unsuccessful. Its mechanism of benefit appears related, at least in part, to changes in plaque compliance resulting from partial atheroma ablation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8456756     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90826-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Rotational atherectomy: technique, indications, results].

Authors:  T Dill; C W Hamm
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Is rotational atherectomy here to stay?

Authors:  P L Whitlow
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Extremely high-pressure dilation with a new noncompliant balloon.

Authors:  José F Díaz; Antonio Gómez-Menchero; Rosa Cardenal; Carlos Sánchez-González; Amit Sanghvi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

4.  Patient Selection and Procedural Considerations for Coronary Orbital Atherectomy System.

Authors:  Yohei Sotomi; Richard A Shlofmitz; Antonio Colombo; Patrick W Serruys; Yoshinobu Onuma
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2016-05

Review 5.  Coronary microembolization--its role in acute coronary syndromes and interventions.

Authors:  R Erbel; G Heusch
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Clinical predictors of mortality following rotational atherectomy and stent implantation in high-risk patients: A single center experience.

Authors:  István F Édes; Zoltán Ruzsa; György Szabó; Sándor Nardai; Dávid Becker; Kálmán Benke; Bálint Szilveszter; Béla Merkely
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Percutaneous Left Main Coronary Intervention: A Review of Plaque Modification in Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Chirag A Shah; Steven E Pfau
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.