Literature DB >> 8452887

'Vector white noise': a technique for mapping the motion receptive fields of direction-selective visual neurons.

M V Srinivasan1, Z F Jin, G Stange, M R Ibbotson.   

Abstract

A technique is described and tested for mapping the sensitivities and preferred directions of motion at different locations within the receptive fields of direction-selective motion-detecting visual neurons. The procedure is to record the responses to a number of visual stimuli, each stimulus presentation consisting of a set of short, randomly-oriented, moving bars arranged in a square grid. Each bar moves perpendicularly to its long axis. The vector describing the sensitivity and preferred direction of motion at each grid location is obtained as a sum of the unit vectors defining the directions of motion of the bars in each of the stimuli at that location, weighted by the strengths of the corresponding responses. The resulting vector field specifies the optimum flow field for the neuron. The advantage of this technique over the conventional approach of probing the receptive field sequentially at each grid location is that the parallel nature of the stimulus is sensitive to nonlinear interactions (such as shunting inhibition for mutual facilitation) between different regions of the visual field. The technique is used to determine accurately the motion receptive fields of direction-selective motion detecting neurons in the optic lobes of insects. It is potentially applicable to motion-sensitive neurons with highly structured receptive fields, such as those in the optic tectum of the pigeon or in area MST of the monkey.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8452887     DOI: 10.1007/bf00224852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  7 in total

1.  Optimization by simulated annealing.

Authors:  S Kirkpatrick; C D Gelatt; M P Vecchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The processing of object and self-motion in the tectofugal and accessory optic pathways of birds.

Authors:  B J Frost; D R Wylie; Y C Wang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Directional tuning curves, elementary movement detectors, and the estimation of the direction of visual movement.

Authors:  J H van Hateren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  K Tanaka; Y Fukada; H A Saito
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Biological image motion processing: a review.

Authors:  K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The Alopex process: visual receptive fields by response feedback.

Authors:  E Tzanakou; R Michalak; E Harth
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  The contrast sensitivity of fly movement-detecting neurons.

Authors:  D Dvorak; M V Srinivasan; A S French
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.886

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Global versus local adaptation in fly motion-sensitive neurons.

Authors:  Peter Neri; Simon B Laughlin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Local and global motion preferences in descending neurons of the fly.

Authors:  Adrian Wertz; Juergen Haag; Alexander Borst
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.836

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.