Literature DB >> 2288083

The processing of object and self-motion in the tectofugal and accessory optic pathways of birds.

B J Frost1, D R Wylie, Y C Wang.   

Abstract

This paper reviews electrophysiological studies of motion processing in the tectofugal and accessory optic systems (AOS), and suggests these are specialized respectively for the analysis of object motion and self motion. Evidence is presented which shows that directionally specific neurons in the tectofugal system process local motion and are inhibited by wholefield motion. These cells respond to kinematograms and moving occlusion edges and may therefore also be involved in figure-ground segregation and depth perception. In contrast, cells in the nucleus of the basal optic root (nBOR), a component of the AOS, respond best to large slowly moving patterns. These cells are directionally selective preferring either upward, downward or backward directions. In the posterior region of the nBOR some cells have been found which are binocular and prefer either the same or opposite directions of motion in the two eyes. Thus, these cells are tuned to respond optimally to either translational or rotational components of wholefield motion and it is suggested these may be involved in the control of posture and locomotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2288083     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90152-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  23 in total

1.  Modelling the control of interceptive actions.

Authors:  P J Beek; J C Dessing; C E Peper; D Bullock
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Shape discrimination by wasps (Paravespula germanica) at the food source: generalization among various types of contrast.

Authors:  Miriam Lehrer; Raymond Campan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Response characteristics of the pigeon's pretectal neurons to illusory contours and motion.

Authors:  Yu-Qiong Niu; Qian Xiao; Rui-Feng Liu; Le-Qing Wu; Shu-Rong Wang
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Visual response characteristics of neurons in the nucleus isthmi magnocellularis and nucleus isthmi parvocellularis of pigeons.

Authors:  Y C Wang; B J Frost
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Whole-brain activity maps reveal stereotyped, distributed networks for visuomotor behavior.

Authors:  Ruben Portugues; Claudia E Feierstein; Florian Engert; Michael B Orger
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  'Vector white noise': a technique for mapping the motion receptive fields of direction-selective visual neurons.

Authors:  M V Srinivasan; Z F Jin; G Stange; M R Ibbotson
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Mathematical requirements of visual-vestibular integration.

Authors:  Douglas A Hanes
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Optic flow input to the hippocampal formation from the accessory optic system.

Authors:  D R Wylie; R G Glover; J D Aitchison
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Figure-ground discrimination in the avian brain: the nucleus rotundus and its inhibitory complex.

Authors:  Martin J Acerbo; Olga F Lazareva; John McInnerney; Emily Leiker; Edward A Wasserman; Amy Poremba
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Insect-Inspired Self-Motion Estimation with Dense Flow Fields--An Adaptive Matched Filter Approach.

Authors:  Simon Strübbe; Wolfgang Stürzl; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.