Literature DB >> 8450759

Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis.

M T Dixon1, D M Hillis.   

Abstract

Using sequence data from the 28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes of selected vertebrates, we investigated the effects that constraints imposed by secondary structure have on the phylogenetic analysis of rRNA sequence data. Our analysis indicates that characters from both base-pairing regions (stems) and non-base-pairing regions (loops) contain phylogenetic information, as judged by the level of support of the phylogenetic results compared with a well-established tree based on both morphological and molecular data. The best results (the greatest level of support of well-accepted nodes) were obtained when the complete data set was used. However, some previously supported nodes were resolved using either the stem or loop bases alone. Stem bases sustain a greater number of compensatory mutations than would be expected at random, but the number is < 40% of that expected under a hypothesis of perfect compensation to maintain secondary structure. Therefore, we suggest that in phylogenetic analyses, the weighting of stem characters be reduced by no more than 20%, relative to that of loop characters. In contrast to previous suggestions, we do not recommend weighting of stem positions by one-half, compared with that of loop positions, because this overcompensates for the constraints that selection imposes on the secondary structure of rRNA.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8450759     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a039998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  47 in total

1.  Evaluation of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) as a molecular marker for phylogenetic inference using sequence and secondary structure information in blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae).

Authors:  M A T Marinho; A C M Junqueira; A M L Azeredo-Espin
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Secondary structure models of D2-D3 expansion segments of 28S rRNA for Hoplolaiminae species.

Authors:  Bae C H; R T Robbins; A L Szalanski
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.402

3.  Large subunit mitochondrial rRNA secondary structures and site-specific rate variation in two lizard lineages.

Authors:  Richard P Brown
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Predicted secondary structure for 28S and 18S rRNA from Ichneumonoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apocrita): impact on sequence alignment and phylogeny estimation.

Authors:  Joseph J Gillespie; Matthew J Yoder; Robert A Wharton
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Rapid evolution of an X-linked microRNA cluster in primates.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Yi Peng; Wen Wang; Bing Su
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Utility of divergent domains of 28S ribosomal RNA in species discrimination of paramphistomes (Trematoda: Digenea: Paramphistomoidea).

Authors:  Jollin A Shylla; Sudeep Ghatani; Veena Tandon
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  K-mer natural vector and its application to the phylogenetic analysis of genetic sequences.

Authors:  Jia Wen; Raymond H F Chan; Shek-Chung Yau; Rong L He; Stephen S T Yau
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.688

8.  Nuclear ribosomal spacer regions in plant phylogenetics: problems and prospects.

Authors:  Péter Poczai; Jaakko Hyvönen
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Testing the Cambrian explosion hypothesis by using a molecular dating technique.

Authors:  L Bromham; A Rambaut; R Fortey; A Cooper; D Penny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Structural characterization of the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) cluster in Calyptratae (Diptera: Schizophora) and its implications for molecular phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  M A T Marinho; A M L Azeredo-Espin; N I T Zanchin
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.