Literature DB >> 8450665

Physiological differences between stutterers and nonstutterers in perceptually fluent speech: EMG amplitude and duration.

P H van Lieshout1, H F Peters, C W Starkweather, W Hulstijn.   

Abstract

Electromyograph (EMG) signals of the m. orbicularis oris inferior evoked by lip-rounding gestures were analyzed to see whether stutterers in their perceptually fluent speech had higher levels of EMG and longer EMG durations. The relationship between levels of EMG and durations of elevated muscle activity was investigated, and a search for the best discriminating EMG measure was made. In contrast to some previous studies on the EMG signals of stutterers, a relatively large group of stutterers (n = 15) and control speakers (n = 20), matched for age and gender, was examined. Both groups took part in a reaction time experiment using verbal items of different length (syllables, words, and sentences) in two time-stress conditions. Measures were taken for lip muscle activity during lip-rounding gestures for the Dutch /o/ sound. Only perceptually fluent trials were analyzed. The results showed that stutterers had significantly higher EMG levels at the moment of speech onset and during speech production than nonstutterers. A much larger difference between the two groups, however, was found for the EMG peak latency measure, which proved to be a very powerful distinctive feature in differentiating stutterers from nonstutterers. The results were discussed with respect to previous findings and recent theories about (speech) motor control strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8450665     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3601.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  10 in total

1.  Developmental Stuttering in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Richard M Arenas; Elizabeth A Walker; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Oral electromyography activation patterns for speech are similar in preschoolers who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Overreliance on auditory feedback may lead to sound/syllable repetitions: simulations of stuttering and fluency-inducing conditions with a neural model of speech production.

Authors:  Oren Civier; Stephen M Tasko; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  Influences of sentence length and syntactic complexity on the speech motor control of children who stutter.

Authors:  Megan K MacPherson; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Increasing phonological complexity reveals heightened instability in inter-articulatory coordination in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Anne Smith; Neeraja Sadagopan; Bridget Walsh; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 2.538

6.  Linear relationship between electromyography and shear wave elastography measurements persists in deep muscles of the upper extremity.

Authors:  Sarah M Barron; Tamara Ordonez Diaz; Federico Pozzi; Terrie Vasilopoulos; Jennifer A Nichols
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.641

7.  Real-time processing in picture naming in adults who stutter: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Nathan D Maxfield; Kalie Morris; Stefan A Frisch; Kathryn Morphew; Joseph L Constantine
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Identifying developmental stuttering and associated comorbidities in electronic health records and creating a phenome risk classifier.

Authors:  Dillon G Pruett; Douglas M Shaw; Hung-Hsin Chen; Lauren E Petty; Hannah G Polikowsky; Shelly Jo Kraft; Robin M Jones; Jennifer E Below
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.538

Review 9.  What causes stuttering?

Authors:  Christian Büchel; Martin Sommer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The Contribution of Surface Electromyographic Assessment for Defining the Stage of Peripheral Facial Paralysis: Flaccid or Sequelae Stage.

Authors:  Daniele Fontes Ferreira Bernardes; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Maria Valeria Schimidt Goffi Gomez
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.