Literature DB >> 8447133

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: experience of a single surgeon.

N J Soper1, D L Dunnegan.   

Abstract

Gallbladder removal using laparoscopic techniques has rapidly been adopted by surgeons around the world. Questions have been raised concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including the safety of the operation, its implications for management of common bile duct stones, and the means by which surgeons should be trained. In the present series, 424 patients were referred to a single surgeon for cholecystectomy during a 22-month period. A traditional open cholecystectomy was performed in 9 patients (2.1%) because of presumed contraindications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in the remaining 415 patients (97.9%). On the basis of preoperative investigations, 19 patients (4.6%) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction were performed in the 13 patients (3.1%) demonstrating choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was converted to an open operation in 8 patients (1.9%) owing to dense adhesions, obscure anatomy, or cholangiographic abnormalities. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully performed in 407 patients (96%) in 95 +/- 2 minutes (mean +/- SEM). Surgical trainees were involved in all operations and performed 68% of the procedures under supervision. Cystic duct cholangiograms were obtained selectively in 129 patients (30.4%). Intraoperative complications occurred in 3 patients, including 1 patient with a minor injury to the common bile duct (0.2%). There was no perioperative mortality, and major complications occurred in 6 patients (1.4%). Minor complications were seen in 12 others (2.8%), and one patient required reoperation for a trocar injury to the jejunum. Prolonged follow-up has revealed one case of asymptomatic retained common bile duct stones (0.2%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can therefore be performed in more than 95% of patients with no mortality and minimal morbidity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8447133     DOI: 10.1007/bf01655698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy: analysis of 500 procedures.

Authors:  A T Spaw; E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-03

Review 2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N J Soper
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J L Cameron; T R Gadacz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Morbidity of surgical treatment for nonmalignant biliary tract disease.

Authors:  F Glenn; C K McSherry; P Dineen
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1968-01

Review 6.  Cholecystectomy: the gold standard.

Authors:  C K McSherry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledochoscopy for the treatment of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  P C Smith; R V Clayman; N J Soper
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients.

Authors:  J H Peters; E C Ellison; J T Innes; J L Liss; K E Nichols; J M Lomano; S R Roby; M E Front; L C Carey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; S B Edge; J Dix; M J Hyser; J B Hanks; R S Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Appraisal of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H A Graves; J F Ballinger; W J Anderson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report from a single center.

Authors:  Konstantinos Vagenas; Stavros N Karamanakos; Charalambos Spyropoulos; Spyros Panagiotopoulos; Menelaos Karanikolas; Michalis Stavropoulos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J S Barkun; G M Fried; A N Barkun; H H Sigman; E J Hinchey; J Garzon; M J Wexler; J L Meakins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Changes in gallbladder surgery: comparative study 4 years before and 4 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Cervantes; G Rojas; J Anton
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Usefulness of gallbladder ejection fraction estimation to predict the recurrence of biliary pain in patients with symptomatic gallstones who did not undergo cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sung Noh Hong; Jong Kyun Lee; Kyu Taek Lee; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Poong Lyul Rhee; Seung Woon Paik; Byung Chul Yoo; Jong Chul Rhee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--can conversion be predicted?

Authors:  S S Sikora; A Kumar; R Saxena; V K Kapoor; S P Kaushik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an academic hospital: evaluation of changes in perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  B D Matthews; G B Williams
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.