Literature DB >> 8447104

Surface segmentation mechanisms and motion perception.

J C Trueswell1, M M Hayhoe.   

Abstract

Two studies are presented which explore how depth information is determined from conditions of transparency and whether this information combines with other depth information to determine the segmenting of motion information on the basis of likely surface boundaries. The first study explored how binocular disparity combines with monocular depth cues associated with transparency to determine whether subjects see one or multiple surfaces in depth in static displays. When transparency provided a depth cue that was consistent with binocular disparity, depth discrimination thresholds were at normal levels. However, if transparency was inconsistent with the binocular disparity, depth discrimination thresholds were elevated, indicating that subjects had difficulty seeing distinct surfaces lying in separate depth planes. Moreover, threshold elevations were found to correspond to the reductions in contrast between the intersecting contours of the stimulus, suggesting that the strength of perceived depth from transparency is the result of attenuated responses from competing contrast sensitive T-junction mechanisms responsible for the detection of opaque occlusion. A second experiment explored whether the grouping of local motion signals relied on surface interpretations that result from the interaction of transparency and disparity. Surface interpretations were manipulated in moving plaids by combining transparent layering and binocular disparity to show that the motion arising from contours is grouped together (pattern motion) when these cues support the existence of a single surface, and is segregated (component motion) when they support separate surfaces. When these cues were consistent, only small disparity differences were required for the gratings to appear as separately moving surfaces. However, when they were inconsistent, greater disparities were required (about a factor of 2 greater). Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the grouping of local motion information is not resolved within the motion system alone. Information seemingly unrelated to motion processing, namely surface segmentation cues, is used to determine whether or not motion information arising from various contours is pooled together to determine a single motion.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8447104     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90088-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Occlusion and the interpretation of visual motion: perceptual and neuronal effects of context.

Authors:  R O Duncan; T D Albright; G R Stoner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Recovering depth-order from orientation-defined junctions.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe; Kayo Miura
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-03

Review 3.  Perceptual categories for spatial layout.

Authors:  D Kersten
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A Generic Mechanism for Perceptual Organization in the Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Pablo R Grassi; Natalia Zaretskaya; Andreas Bartels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Visual motion perception.

Authors:  T D Albright; G R Stoner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The perception of color from motion.

Authors:  C M Cicerone; D D Hoffman; P D Gowdy; J S Kim
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

7.  Bi-stable depth ordering of superimposed moving gratings.

Authors:  Rubén Moreno-Bote; Asya Shpiro; John Rinzel; Nava Rubin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.