Literature DB >> 8446766

Saccadic eye movements and dual-task interference.

H Pashler1, M Carrier, J Hoffman.   

Abstract

Four dual-task experiments required a speeded manual choice response to a tone in a close temporal proximity to a saccadic eye movement task. In Experiment 1, subjects made a saccade towards a single transient; in Experiment 2, a red and a green colour patch were presented to left and right, and the saccade was to which ever patch was the pre-specified target colour. There was some slowing of the eye movement, but neither task combination showed typical dual-task interference (the "psychological refractory effect"). However, more interference was observed when the direction of the saccade depended on whether a central colour patch was red or green, or when the saccade was directed towards the numerically higher of two large digits presented to the left and the right. Experiment 5 examined a vocal second task, for comparison. The findings might reflect the fact that eye movements can be directed by two separate brain systems--the superior colliculus and the frontal eye fields; commands from the latter but not the former may be delayed by simultaneous unrelated sensorimotor tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8446766     DOI: 10.1080/14640749308401067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  25 in total

1.  Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production.

Authors:  Victor S Ferreira; Harold Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration.

Authors:  Amelia R Hunt; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

Review 3.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

4.  Dual-task costs and benefits in anti-saccade performance.

Authors:  David R Evens; Casimir J H Ludwig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Crossmodal action selection: evidence from dual-task compatibility.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

7.  Decision-related perturbations of decision-irrelevant eye movements.

Authors:  Sung Jun Joo; Leor N Katz; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Target selection in eye-hand coordination: Do we reach to where we look or do we look to where we reach?

Authors:  Annette Horstmann; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Eye movements, not hypercompatible mappings, are critical for eliminating the cost of task set reconfiguration.

Authors:  Amelia R Hunt; Yoko Ishigami; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

10.  Oculomotor responses and visuospatial perceptual judgments compete for common limited resources.

Authors:  Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.