Literature DB >> 8445415

Second cancer risk following testicular cancer: a follow-up study of 1,909 patients.

F E van Leeuwen1, A M Stiggelbout, A W van den Belt-Dusebout, R Noyon, M R Eliel, E H van Kerkhoff, J F Delemarre, R Somers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Improved survival in testicular cancer has been accompanied by concern about long-term side effects of therapy. We assessed the evolution of second cancer (SC) risk over a prolonged follow-up period, which has been rarely studied in large patient series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We estimated the risk of SCs in 1,909 patients with testicular cancer diagnosed in the Netherlands from 1971 to 1985. Complete medical information was obtained up to at least January 1988 for 92% of patients. Median follow-up was 7.7 years. For 89% of second tumors the diagnosis was confirmed through review of histologic slides; for an additional 8%, the diagnosis was verified by pathology reports only.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients developed a SC 1 year or more after start of treatment, as compared with 47.6 expected on the basis of incidence rates in the general population (relative risk [RR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 2.1). The mean 15-year actuarial risk of all SCs was 9.8% (95% CI, 7.5% to 12.8%). Significantly increased RRs were observed for all gastrointestinal cancers combined (RR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.7 to 3.9), stomach cancer (RR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.8 to 6.8), contralateral testicular cancer (CLTC) (RR, 35.7; 95% CI, 21.8 to 55.2), and leukemia (RR, 5.1; 95% CI, 1.4 to 13.0). Patients who had received irradiation to the paraaortic lymph nodes and who survived testicular cancer for more than 5 years were at particularly high risk of developing stomach cancer (RR, 6.9; 95% CI, 3.3 to 12.7). The median interval between the diagnosis of testicular cancer and stomach cancer was 12.4 years. Patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) did not experience an increase in SCs in general. Indeed, CT-treated patients, as compared with those who received radiotherapy (RT), or surgery alone, had significantly reduced risk of CLTC. This finding might be attributed to an eradicating effect of CT on carcinoma in situ or subclinical CLTC. The excess risk of leukemia was not found to be clearly related to CT.
CONCLUSION: Testicular cancer patients who receive RT experience elevated risk of gastrointestinal tumors. CT does not seem to increase SC risk and may even decrease the risk of a CLTC. Following testicular cancer, the 15-year actuarial risk of all SCs is only about half the risk experienced by patients with Hodgkin's disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8445415     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  42 in total

Review 1.  Comparative tolerability of chemotherapy regimens for germ cell cancer.

Authors:  S Culine; J P Droz
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Canadian consensus guidelines for the management of testicular germ cell cancer.

Authors:  Lori Wood; Christian Kollmannsberger; Michael Jewett; Peter Chung; Sebastian Hotte; Martin O'Malley; Joan Sweet; Lynn Anson-Cartwright; Eric Winquist; Scott North; Scott Tyldesley; Jeremy Sturgeon; Mary Gospodarowicz; Roanne Segal; Tina Cheng; Peter Venner; Malcolm Moore; Peter Albers; Robert Huddart; Craig Nichols; Padraig Warde
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for high-risk stage I and stage IIA seminoma.

Authors:  Zaza Mezvrishvili; Laurent Managadze
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Renal cell carcinoma following testicular cancer: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Dennis Gyomber; Damien M Bolton
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Solid tumors after chemotherapy or surgery for testicular nonseminoma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Chunkit Fung; Sophie D Fossa; Michael T Milano; Jan Oldenburg; Lois B Travis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Second malignancies in long-term testicular cancer survivors.

Authors:  D Ondrus; M Ondrusova; L Friedova
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Exploring the spectrum of late effects following radical orchidectomy for stage I testicular seminoma: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jennifer A Soon; Angelyn Anton; Javier Torres; Ruth Lawrence; Phillip Parente; Joseph McKendrick; Ian D Davis; Carmel Pezaro
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Clinical stage I seminoma: the case for surveillance.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Neil Fleshner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Update on management of seminoma.

Authors:  Emma J Alexander; Ingrid M White; Alan Horwich
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

10.  Treatment-related ureteral cancer following stage II testicular seminoma.

Authors:  Kosuke Mizutani; Hidetoshi Ehara; Shigeaki Yokoi; Nguyen B Phuoc; Takashi Deguchi; Yoshinobu Hirose
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.