Literature DB >> 8444142

How much do we know about spontaneous human mutation rates?

J F Crow1.   

Abstract

The much larger number of cell divisions between zygote and sperm than between zygote and egg, the increased age of fathers of children with new dominant mutations, and the greater evolution rate of pseudogenes of the Y chromosome than of those on autosomes all point to a much higher mutation rate in human males than in females, as first pointed out by Haldane [Ann Eugen 13:262-271, 1947] in his classical study of X-linked hemophilia. The age of the father is the main factor determining the human spontaneous mutation rate, and probably the total mutation rate. The total mutation rate in Drosophila males of genes causing minor reduction in viability is at least 0.4 per sperm, and may be considerably higher. The great mutation load implied by a rate of approximately 1 per zygote can be greatly ameliorated by quasi-truncation selection. Corresponding data are not available for the human population. The evolution rate of pseudogenes in primates suggests some 10(2) new mutations per zygote. Presumably the overwhelming majority of these are neutral, but even the approximate fraction is not known. Statistical evidence in Drosophila shows that mutations with minor effects cause about the same heterozygous impairment of fitness as those that are lethal when homozygous. The magnitude of heterozygous effect is such that almost all mutant genes are eliminated as heterozygotes before ever becoming homozygous. Although quantitative data in the human species are lacking, anecdotal information supports the conclusion that partial dominance is the rule here as well. This suggests that if the human mutation rate were increased or decreased, the effects would be spread over a period of 50-100 generations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8444142     DOI: 10.1002/em.2850210205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  27 in total

1.  Estimation of parameters of deleterious mutations in partial selfing or partial outcrossing populations and in nonequilibrium populations.

Authors:  J Li; H W Deng
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  On the evolutionary advantage of fitness-associated recombination.

Authors:  Lilach Hadany; Tuvik Beker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Estimating mutation rate: how to count mutations?

Authors:  Yun-Xin Fu; Haying Huai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future.

Authors:  Fyodor A Kondrashov; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Characteristics, causes and evolutionary consequences of male-biased mutation.

Authors:  Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  High male:female ratio of germ-line mutations: an alternative explanation for postulated gestational lethality in males in X-linked dominant disorders.

Authors:  G H Thomas
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Characterization of deleterious mutations in outcrossing populations.

Authors:  H W Deng
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The effect of overdominance on characterizing deleterious mutations in large natural populations.

Authors:  J L Li; J Li; H W Deng
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Inferring Deleterious-Mutation Parameters in Natural Daphnia Populations.

Authors:  Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  1998-05-14       Impact factor: 3.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.