Literature DB >> 8444019

Perception of conspecific faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Synthetic models.

S D Brown1, R J Dooling.   

Abstract

Perception of faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) was studied with computerized images modeled after natural faces. Individual facial characteristics were varied with all others held constant; then relative importance among several features was determined by varying each within a single experiment. Characteristics with the potential to signal important biological information (e.g., age or sex) were perceptually salient, whereas characteristics that vary among faces but have limited potential to signal important information were not. Model faces were also presented in a normal or an altered configuration. Birds discriminated among faces in a normal configuration more easily than among models with an altered configuration even when the facial features on which the discrimination was based differed in the same way; this suggests that configurational cues play an important role in face perception by budgerigars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8444019     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.107.1.48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  8 in total

1.  A comparative view of face perception.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  The roles of receptor noise and cone oil droplets in the photopic spectral sensitivity of the budgerigar, Melopsittacus undulatus.

Authors:  T H Goldsmith; B K Butler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Target-defining features in a "people-present/people-absent" discrimination task by pigeons.

Authors:  Ulrike Aust; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

4.  Elemental versus configural perception in a people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons.

Authors:  Ulrike Aust; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz; Gauri Pradhan
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  The performance of ravens on simple discrimination tasks: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Friederike Range; Thomas Bugnyar; Kurt Kotrschal
Journal:  Acta Ethol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 1.231

7.  Facial Recognition in a Group-Living Cichlid Fish.

Authors:  Masanori Kohda; Lyndon Alexander Jordan; Takashi Hotta; Naoya Kosaka; Kenji Karino; Hirokazu Tanaka; Masami Taniyama; Tomohiro Takeyama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Facial Recognition in a Discus Fish (Cichlidae): Experimental Approach Using Digital Models.

Authors:  Shun Satoh; Hirokazu Tanaka; Masanori Kohda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.