Literature DB >> 8443752

A prospective study of the prognostic value of cathepsin D levels in breast cancer cytosol.

P Pujol1, T Maudelonde, J P Daures, P Rouanet, J P Brouillet, H Pujol, H Rochefort.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cathepsin D is a lysosomal protease overexpressed and abnormally secreted in most breast cancer cells. Several retrospective clinical studies have shown that cathepsin D is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer that is associated with a higher risk of recurrence and a shorter overall survival.
METHODS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first prospective study in which the prognostic value of cathepsin D was studied in 123 patients with primary breast cancer who were followed for 5 years between March 1985 and December 1990. Cathepsin D concentrations in breast cancer cytosol were measured using a solid-phase sandwich immunoenzymatic assay. The most significant prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional-hazards method.
RESULTS: The median value of cathepsin D was 20.8 pmol/mg of protein, which was approximately half than the median value found in subsequent assays done using a commercially available kit and reported in most retrospective studies. The cathepsin D status or level was correlated only with axillary lymph node involvement. A univariate analysis showed that high levels of cathepsin D (> 20 pmol/mg of protein) were correlated with a higher risk of recurrence and a shorter overall survival (P < 0.01 and P < 0.03, respectively). Using multivariate analysis, a high cathepsin D level, a negative progesterone receptor status, and lymph node involvement were the most important factors for predicting relapse-free survival (P = 0.02, P < 0.01, and P < 0.05, respectively). The cathepsin D level had prognostic value in patients with node-positive disease (P = 0.001) and appeared to be particularly useful in association with the progesterone receptor status by isolating a high-risk subgroup of patients (high cathepsin D level; negative progesterone receptor status).
CONCLUSIONS: This first prospective study confirmed the prognostic value of the cathepsin D level in association with other major prognostic factors. The next step will be to determine whether the subset of patients with high cathepsin D levels would benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8443752     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930315)71:6<2006::aid-cncr2820710614>3.0.co;2-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of the prognostic significance of nm23/NDP kinase and cathepsin D in anal carcinomas. An immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  R Holm; G Tanum
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Western immunoblotting and enzymatic activity analysis of cathepsin D in human breast cancer cell lines of different invasive potential. Regulation by 17beta-estradiol, tamoxifen and ICI 182,780.

Authors:  D Couissi; V Dubois; C Remacle; E Schonne; A Trouet
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Immunohistochemical detection of nm23/NDP kinase and cathepsin D in medullary carcinomas of the thyroid gland.

Authors:  R Holm; J Høie; O Kaalhus; J M Nesland
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Response to P.M. Ravdin (BCRT 24:219-226, 1993), "Evaluation of Cathepsin D as a Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer".

Authors:  H Rochefort; S Thorpe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Prognostic value of cathepsin D in breast cancer: comparison of immunohistochemical and immunoradiometric detection methods.

Authors:  U J Göhring; A Scharl; U Thelen; A Ahr; G Crombach; B R Titius
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Molecular and genetic prognostic factors of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Arnab Chakravarti; Gary Guotang Zhai
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Prognostic evaluation of oestrogen-regulated protein immunoreactivity in ductal invasive (NOS) breast cancer.

Authors:  L Nakopoulou; A C Lazaris; D Baltas; I Giannopoulou; N Kavantzas; A Tzonou
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Reevaluating cathepsin D as a biomarker for breast cancer: serum activity levels versus histopathology.

Authors:  Daniel E Abbott; Naira V Margaryan; Jacqueline S Jeruss; Seema Khan; Virginia Kaklamani; David J Winchester; Nora Hansen; Alfred Rademaker; Zhila Khalkhali-Ellis; Mary J C Hendrix
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 9.  Possible role of procathepsin D in human cancer.

Authors:  A Vashishta; M Fusek; V Vetvicka
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  New insights into procathepsin D in pathological and physiological conditions.

Authors:  Sujata Saraswat-Ohri; Vaclav Vetvicka
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2011-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.