Literature DB >> 8443747

Surgical lateral clearance in resected rectal carcinomas. A multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic features.

I O Ng1, I S Luk, S T Yuen, P W Lau, C J Pritchett, M Ng, G P Poon, J Ho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Incomplete removal of the tumor is the main cause of local recurrence in rectal carcinomas; this often occurs at the lateral aspects devoid of the peritoneum. The authors examined prospectively 80 resected rectal carcinoma specimens in an attempt to discover a reliable method to detect lateral resection margin (LRM) involvement by these tumors and to identify pathologic factors that would be prognostically important.
METHODS: In each of the 80 resected specimens, the whole tumor was embedded, and whole-mount sections of the entire tumor and the surrounding mesorectum were examined after serial transverse slicing. The distance from the outermost part of the tumor to the LRM (surgical clearance) was measured.
RESULTS: Six (7.5%) of the 80 specimens showed LRM involvement (defined as surgical clearance < or = 1 mm) in the single slice seen macroscopically to have the deepest tumor invasion, whereas 16 specimens (20%) were found to have LRM involved after examining all slices microscopically. Surgically clearance had a strong inverse relationship with Dukes staging (P < 0.001) and depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.001). The overall local recurrence rate was 28%; it was much higher (53%) in the patients who had LRM involved by tumor. As a whole, local recurrence was related significantly to LRM involvement (P = 0.006). Survival rates were correlated with macroscopic (n = 3) and microscopic (n = 13) features of the resected specimens using Cox multivariate regression analysis. Three of the nine pathologic parameters isolated (i.e., surgical clearance, cellular differentiation, and number of involved pericolic lymph nodes) were identified as favorable independent prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence is related closely to LRM involvement. Embedding and examining the entire tumor and mesorectum is the only reliable and satisfactory means of assessing LRM. Detailed pathologic study on the resected tumor is important when assessing the prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8443747     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930315)71:6<1972::aid-cncr2820710608>3.0.co;2-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

1.  Management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; T A Sheldon; R Gray; A Sowden
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06

2.  Microscopic spread of low rectal cancer in regions of the mesorectum: detailed pathological assessment with whole-mount sections.

Authors:  Zhao Wang; Zongguang Zhou; Cun Wang; Gaoping Zhao; Youdai Chen; Hongkai Gao; Xuelian Zheng; Rong Wang; Daiyun Chen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The measurement of liver resection margins.

Authors:  E E Rutherford; N D Karanjia
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Peritoneal involvement by rectal cancer.

Authors:  R C Newland; P H Chapuis; O F Dent; E L Bokey
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.

Authors:  A D Bull; A H Biffin; J Mella; A G Radcliffe; J D Stamatakis; R J Steele; G T Williams
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  An assessment of the anatomical relationship between the pelvic plexus and the rectal wall to determine the indications for its preservation in surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  H Yamakoshi; H Ike; S Oki; M Hara; H Shimada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Correlation of rectal tumor volumes with oncological outcomes for low rectal cancers: does tumor size matter?

Authors:  Muhammad Tayyab; Abdul Razack; Abhiram Sharma; James Gunn; John E Hartley
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 8.  The role of the pathologist in rectal cancer diagnosis and staging and surgical quality assessment.

Authors:  Carmen Faus; Desamparados Roda; Matteo Frasson; Susana Roselló; Eduardo García-Granero; Blas Flor-Lorente; Samuel Navarro
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 9.  Distal dissection in total mesorectal excision, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy and lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jin-ichi Hida; Kiyotaka Okuno; Tadao Tokoro
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Microscopic spread of low rectal cancer in regions of mesorectum: pathologic assessment with whole-mount sections.

Authors:  Zhao Wang; Zong-Guang Zhou; Cun Wang; Gao-Ping Zhao; You-Dai Chen; Hong-Kai Gao; Xue-Lian Zheng; Rong Wang; Dai-Yun Chen; Wei-Ping Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.