Literature DB >> 8443029

Comparison of quinapril and atenolol as single drugs or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in moderate to severe hypertensives, using automated ambulatory monitoring.

Y Lacourcière1, J Lefebvre, P Provencher, L Poirier.   

Abstract

1. Forty patients with moderate to severe hypertension and daytime ambulatory diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg were randomized double-blind to once-daily treatment with either quinapril up to 20 mg (n = 20) or atenolol up to 100 mg (n = 20) as single drugs or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg over a period of 12 weeks. 2. Conventional and ambulatory blood pressure, heart rate, side effects and metabolic changes were compared at the end of the run-in period on placebo, after 4 weeks on monotherapy and at the end of the 12-week period of active treatment. 3. Quinapril and atenolol reduced conventional blood pressure equally with substantial additional effect seen on combination therapy. The two regimens induced a significant decrease in ambulatory BP. However, the atenolol treated ambulatory hypertensive group experienced significantly greater decreases in diastolic blood pressure during 24 h, awake and sleep periods than did the quinapril group. 4. Adverse reactions were mild with both drugs except for severe Raynaud phenomenon in one patient in the atenolol group. Triglyceride levels were significantly increased with atenolol alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. 5. Thus, within the limits of the dose ranges tested, quinapril and atenolol as single drugs or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide reduce significantly conventional and ambulatory blood pressure in moderate to severe hypertensives, but atenolol is more effective in reducing ambulatory diastolic blood pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8443029      PMCID: PMC1381502          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1993.tb05677.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  24 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the evaluation of blood pressure lowering drugs.

Authors:  E O'Brien; J P Cox; K O'Malley
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 2.  Automated blood pressure monitoring for the assessment of antihypertensive treatment.

Authors:  M A Weber
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-10-05       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Antihypertensive efficacy of lisinopril. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  P K Zachariah; S G Sheps; G L Schwartz; A Schirger; D M Ilstrup; C R Long; C A Carlson
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  How common is white coat hypertension?

Authors:  T G Pickering; G D James; C Boddie; G A Harshfield; S Blank; J H Laragh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-01-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Plasma triglyceride levels and coronary disease.

Authors:  J D Brunzell; M A Austin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Validation of portable noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices: comparisons with intra-arterial and sphygmomanometer measurements.

Authors:  W F Graettinger; J L Lipson; D G Cheung; M A Weber
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 7.  The effects of drug treatment for hypertension on morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease: a review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  S W MacMahon; J A Cutler; C D Furberg; G H Payne
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

8.  Characterization of antihypertensive therapy by whole-day blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  M A Weber; D G Cheung; W F Graettinger; J L Lipson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-06-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Atenolol and chlorthalidone in combination for hypertension.

Authors:  D N Bateman; C R Dean; J C Mucklow; C J Bulpitt; C T Dollery
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  The influence of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on the design and interpretation of trials in hypertension.

Authors:  A J Coats; A Radaelli; S J Clark; J Conway; P Sleight
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Quinapril: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  Christine R Culy; Blair Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Peripheral vasoconstriction induced by β-adrenoceptor blockers: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charles Khouri; Thomas Jouve; Sophie Blaise; Patrick Carpentier; Jean-Luc Cracowski; Matthieu Roustit
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Quinapril. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  G L Plosker; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Comparative efficacy of two different beta-blockers on 24-hour blood pressure control.

Authors:  Pantelis Sarafidis; Zvezdana Bogojevic; Emad Basta; Emily Kirstner; George L Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.