Literature DB >> 3373659

Characterization of antihypertensive therapy by whole-day blood pressure monitoring.

M A Weber1, D G Cheung, W F Graettinger, J L Lipson.   

Abstract

Whole-day ambulatory monitoring is used for diagnosing hypertension and for judging response to treatment. We evaluated both of these properties in an antihypertensive trial with the calcium channel blocker diltiazem hydrochloride. Measured by a conventional sphygmomanometer, systolic and diastolic blood pressures fell significantly in patients who received diltiazem, whereas no consistent changes occurred in those who received placebo. Administration of the drug also decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressures evenly throughout the day, as determined by automated monitoring. The 15 diltiazem-treated patients were subdivided into those whose clinically diagnosed hypertension was confirmed by pretreatment blood pressure monitoring (24-hour average diastolic blood pressure, greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg; n = 9) and those whose 24-hour blood pressures failed to meet this criterion (n = 6). Diltiazem therapy decreased average whole-day blood pressures by 18/13 mm Hg in the hypertensives but by only 0/1 mm Hg in the others. Thus, whole-day blood pressure monitoring strengthens antihypertensive trials by documenting efficacy and duration of treatment. In addition, it enhances the diagnosis of hypertension, thereby identifying those patients in whom treatment seems justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3373659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  17 in total

1.  Use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the management of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  J M Mallion; A Maitre; R de Gaudemaris; J P Siché; F Tremel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Diltiazem. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  M M Buckley; S M Grant; K L Goa; D McTavish; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Defining the patient group for cost-effective withdrawal of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  L R Krakoff; S Wassertheil-Smoller
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Verapamil 240 SR versus verapamil 120 SR in arterial hypertension. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  L Corea; M Bentivoglio; S Berioli; C Bianchini; K Savino; M Sardina
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 5.  Treatment of white coat hypertension.

Authors:  S G Chrysant
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 6.  Vasodilators during cerebral aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  K Abe
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Comparison of casual, ambulatory and self-measured blood pressure in a study of nitrendipine vs bisoprolol.

Authors:  T Mengden; B Bättig; M Schubert; T Jeck; B Weisser; C Buddeberg; W Vetter
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure profile of a new slow-release formulation of diltiazem in mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  A G Dupont; J M Coupez; P Jensen; R Coupez-Lopinot; D F Schoors; P Hermanns; M Nicolas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 9.  Diltiazem. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in older patients.

Authors:  A Markham; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Morning versus evening administration of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system in the management of essential hypertension.

Authors:  P Greminger; P M Suter; D Holm; R Kobelt; W Vetter
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1994-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.