Literature DB >> 8442550

Emergency department satisfaction: what matters most?

B Bursch1, J Beezy, R Shaw.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative importance of variables correlated with patient satisfaction with emergency department care and service.
DESIGN: Retrospective telephone survey targeting all patients who visited the Panorama City Kaiser Permanente ED from April 4 to April 17, 1991. Patients were contacted within one week of their discharge from the ED or hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-eight ED patients completed telephone surveys. Fifty-one percent of the respondents were male, and the mean age was 53 years. The majority of the respondents were white (70%); the most common service received was medical (82%). MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Of the 14 variables that were found to be correlated with overall ED satisfaction, a multiple regression analysis revealed that the five most important variables were patient satisfaction with the amount of time it took before being cared for in the ED; patients' ratings of how caring the nurses were, how organized the ED staff was, and how caring the physicians were; and patient satisfaction with the amount of information the nurses gave them about what was happening to them.
CONCLUSION: The total time patients spend in the ED and patients' perceptions of their wait time for an ED bed are not as important to patient satisfaction as is receiving prompt and caring service. The above service variables are key areas that may be targeted to improve ED services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8442550     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81947-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  25 in total

1.  When should waiting time become a quality of care issue in the paediatric emergency department?

Authors:  David McGillivray
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Predicting patient satisfaction: a study of two emergency departments.

Authors:  P R Yarnold; E A Michelson; D A Thompson; S L Adams
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-12

3.  Traditional nurse triage vs physician telepresence in a pediatric ED.

Authors:  Greg P Marconi; Todd Chang; Phung K Pham; Daniel N Grajower; Alan L Nager
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  A Pilot Study of the Chronology of Present Illness: Restructuring the HPI to Improve Physician Cognition and Communication.

Authors:  Laura M Mazer; Tina Storage; Sylvia Bereknyei; Jeffrey Chi; Kelley Skeff
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Rationing in the emergency department: the good, the bad, and the unacceptable.

Authors:  E Cross; S Goodacre; A O'Cathain; J Arnold
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Optimizing management and financial performance of the teaching ambulatory care clinic.

Authors:  James E Stahl; Mark S Roberts; Scott Gazelle
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Healthcare provider complaints to the emergency department: a preliminary report on a new quality improvement instrument.

Authors:  R T Griffey; J S Bohan
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-10

8.  Pagers in a busy paediatric emergency waiting room: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dennis Scolnik; Pauline Matthews; Jon Caulfeild; Connie Williams; Brian M Feldman
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 9.  Patient satisfaction in emergency medicine.

Authors:  C Taylor; J R Benger
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  Waiting and interaction times for patients in a developing country accident and emergency department.

Authors:  K Banerjea; A O Carter
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.