Literature DB >> 12709093

Optimizing management and financial performance of the teaching ambulatory care clinic.

James E Stahl1, Mark S Roberts, Scott Gazelle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine how to optimize teaching ambulatory care clinics performance with regard to access to care, access to teaching, and financial viability.
DESIGN: Optimization analysis using computer simulation.
METHODS: A discrete-event simulation model of the teaching ambulatory clinic setting was developed. This method captures flow time, waiting time, competition for resources, and the interdependency of events, providing insight into system dynamics. Sensitivity analyses were performed on staffing levels, room availability, patient characteristics such as "new" versus "established" status, and clinical complexity and pertinent probabilities. MAIN
RESULTS: In the base-case, 4 trainees:preceptor, patient flow time (registration to check out) was 148 minutes (SD 5), wait time was 20.6 minutes (SD 4.4), the wait for precepting was 6.2 minutes (SD 1.2), and average daily net clinic income was $1,413. Utilization rates were preceptors (59%), trainees (61%), medical assistants (64%), and room (68%). Flow time and the wait times remained relatively constant for strategies with trainee:preceptor ratios <4:1 but increased with number of trainees steadily thereafter. Maximum revenue occurred with 3 preceptors and 5 trainees per preceptor. The model was relatively insensitive to the proportion of patients presenting who were new, and relatively sensitive to average evaluation and management (E/M) level. Flow and wait times rose on average by 0.05 minutes and 0.01 minutes per percent new patient, respectively. For each increase in average E/M level, flow time increased 8.4 minutes, wait time 1.2 minutes, wait for precepting 0.8 minutes, and net income increased by $490.
CONCLUSION: Teaching ambulatory care clinics appear to operate optimally, minimizing flow time and waiting time while maximizing revenue, with trainee-to-preceptor ratios between 3 and 7 to 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12709093      PMCID: PMC1494840          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20726.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  30 in total

1.  Job burnout.

Authors:  C Maslach; W B Schaufeli; M P Leiter
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Measuring consumer perceptions of quality differences among competing health benefit plans.

Authors:  Katherine Harris; Jennifer Schultz; Roger Feldman
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Precepting in a community based internal medicine teaching practice; results of a time-motion study.

Authors:  S Nahvi; S H Kesan; J Coppola; R S Crausman
Journal:  Med Health R I       Date:  2001-08

4.  Using simulation in out-patient queues: a case study.

Authors:  F Huarng; M H Lee
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  1996

5.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1995 outpatient department summary.

Authors:  L F McCaig
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  1997-05-07

6.  Comparison of housestaff's estimates of their workday activities with results of a random work-sampling study.

Authors:  E Oddone; S Guarisco; D Simel
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Using statistical process control to demonstrate the effect of operational interventions on quality indicators in the emergency department.

Authors:  R A Schwab; S M DelSorbo; M R Cunningham; K Craven; W A Watson
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.095

8.  Emergency department satisfaction: what matters most?

Authors:  B Bursch; J Beezy; R Shaw
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  What do New Zealand general practitioners do in their offices?

Authors:  A S Baker
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1976-03-24

10.  Variability in clinical systems: applying modern quality control methods to health care.

Authors:  N J Banks; R H Palmer; D M Berwick; P Plsek
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1995-08
View more
  7 in total

1.  Ambulatory internal medicine training: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  David C Dugdale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Modelling methods for pharmacoeconomics and health technology assessment: an overview and guide.

Authors:  James E Stahl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Improving clinical access and continuity through physician panel redesign.

Authors:  Hari Balasubramanian; Ritesh Banerjee; Brian Denton; James Naessens; James Stahl
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Estimating the cost of no-shows and evaluating the effects of mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Bjorn P Berg; Michael Murr; David Chermak; Jonathan Woodall; Michael Pignone; Robert S Sandler; Brian T Denton
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Studying and Incorporating Efficiency into Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Centers.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; David Belson
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Efficiency of endoscopy units can be improved with use of discrete event simulation modeling.

Authors:  Bryan G Sauer; Kanwar P Singh; Barry L Wagner; Matthew S Vanden Hoek; Katherine Twilley; Steven M Cohn; Vanessa M Shami; Andrew Y Wang
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-10-28

Review 7.  Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Jesús Isaac Vázquez-Serrano; Rodrigo E Peimbert-García; Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.