Literature DB >> 8441076

A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of ureteral calculi in emergency departments.

T J Elton1, C S Roth, T H Berquist, M D Silverstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine: 1) whether a simple clinical prediction rule could identify emergency department patients with ureteral calculi; 2) whether the kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) radiograph provides diagnostic information beyond that obtained from the history and physical examination; and 3) whether ureteral calculi can be diagnosed accurately in the emergency department without emergency excretory urography, commonly known as intravenous pyelography (IVP). PATIENTS: Two hundred three patients who underwent emergency KUB and IVP studies for nontraumatic abdominal or flank pain (derivation group) were retrospectively identified from radiology department records; 72 patients were prospectively evaluated in the emergency department for suspected ureteral stones (validation group). MEASUREMENTS: Clinical information included age, gender, characteristics of pain, associated symptoms, presence of fever, history of ureteral calculi, whether a stone was passed, and results of urinalysis and KUB and IVP studies. All KUB and IVP radiographs were independently reviewed by a radiologist blinded to the patient's clinical information and urinalysis results.
DESIGN: Stepwise linear discriminant analysis was used to derive a four-item prediction rule from the derivation group and the validation group; the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the misclassification rates were compared.
RESULTS: The four-item rule (acute onset, flank pain, hematuria, and positive KUB radiograph) correctly classified 83% of patients in the derivation group and 90% in the validation group. The four-item rule had an ROC area of 0.86 in the derivation group and 0.89 in the validation group. The KUB radiograph significantly improved the discriminant ability of the two history items and the urinalysis result. Thirty-three percent of patients were identified to be in a subset with a 96% probability of having a stone.
CONCLUSION: These findings, which should be confirmed in another emergency department, suggest that subsets of patients with suspected ureteral calculi may be managed without emergency IVP; this approach thereby reduces the time a patient spends in the emergency department, radiation exposure, expense, and morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8441076     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  18 in total

Review 1.  Radiology of the urinary system in the emergency department.

Authors:  C M Sandler; J T Burke
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 2.  Radiographic imaging and urologic decision making in the management of renal and ureteral calculi.

Authors:  K N Van Arsdalen; M P Banner; H M Pollack
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Evaluation of a sequence of diagnostic tests using the workup of ureteral stone as a model.

Authors:  J T Rhea; S A DeLuca; B D Toombs
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Calculus disease in the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  E O Singh; R S Malek
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 0.800

6.  Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Principles and applications.

Authors:  P F Griner; R J Mayewski; A I Mushlin; P Greenland
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The frequency of urolithiasis in hospital discharge diagnoses in the United States.

Authors:  R Sierakowski; B Finlayson; R R Landes; C D Finlayson; N Sierakowski
Journal:  Invest Urol       Date:  1978-05

Review 8.  New approaches in the treatment of renal calculi.

Authors:  W M O'Brien; J E Rotolo; J J Pahira
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.292

9.  Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota.

Authors:  C M Johnson; D M Wilson; W M O'Fallon; R S Malek; L T Kurland
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Utility of the plain abdominal radiograph for diagnosing ureteral calculi.

Authors:  C S Roth; B A Bowyer; T H Berquist
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  12 in total

1.  Association of spontaneous expulsion with C-reactive protein and other clinico-demographic factors in patients with lower ureteric stone.

Authors:  Amit Jain; Sreerag Kodakkattil Sreenivasan; Ramanitharan Manikandan; Lalgudi Narayanan Dorairajan; Sujatha Sistla; Subathra Adithan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Relationship Between Spontaneous Passage Rates of Ureteral Stones Less Than 8 mm and Serum C-Reactive Protein Levels and Neutrophil Percentages.

Authors:  Chang Hyun Park; Ji Yong Ha; Choal Hee Park; Chun Il Kim; Kwang Se Kim; Byung Hoon Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-09-10

3.  Bilateral stones as a cause of acute renal failure in the emergency department.

Authors:  Joaquín V Alonso; Pedro L Cachinero; Fran R Ubeda; Daniel J L Ruiz; Alfredo Blanco
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2014

4.  The renal resistive index as a predictor of acute hydronephrosis in patients with renal colic.

Authors:  E M S Piazzese; G I Mazzeo; S Galipò; F Fiumara; C Canfora; L G Angiò
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2012-10-14

5.  Expectant Management of Ureter Stones: Outcome and Clinical Factors of Spontaneous Passage in a Single Institution's Experience.

Authors:  Dong-Un Tchey; Yun Sok Ha; Won Tae Kim; Seok Joong Yun; Sang Cheol Lee; Wun Jae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-12-20

6.  Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for uncomplicated ureteral stone--the STONE score: retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies.

Authors:  Christopher L Moore; Scott Bomann; Brock Daniels; Seth Luty; Annette Molinaro; Dinesh Singh; Cary P Gross
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-03-26

7.  Does the use of bedside ultrasonography reduce emergency department length of stay for patients with renal colic?: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yong Hoon Park; Ru Bi Jung; Young Geun Lee; Chong Kun Hong; Jung-Hwan Ahn; Tae Yong Shin; Young Sik Kim; Young Rock Ha
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12-30

8.  Ultrasound detection of a renal mass in a patient with flank pain and hematuria.

Authors:  Karl Marzec; Thomas Mailhot; Phillips Perera
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-03

Review 9.  Managing acute abdominal pain in pediatric patients: current perspectives.

Authors:  Nadia M Hijaz; Craig A Friesen
Journal:  Pediatric Health Med Ther       Date:  2017-06-29

10.  Alpha-blockers after shock wave lithotripsy for renal or ureteral stones in adults.

Authors:  Makinna C Oestreich; Robin Wm Vernooij; Niranjan J Sathianathen; Eu Chang Hwang; Gretchen M Kuntz; Alex Koziarz; Charles D Scales; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.