| Literature DB >> 84407 |
L D Zinkin, L D Katz, J D Rosin.
Abstract
The use of the resectoscope has several advantages in treating the patient with inoperable obstructive carcinoma of the rectum, particularly when compared with fulguration. It is immediate in its results, as often testified to by the sudden outpouring of blockaded feces. It is also safer in allowing greater amounts of tissue to be resected with less depth of tissue injury by the electrical output. It does, however, require the skills of someone able to handle the instrument, and the procedure should be a joint effort by the surgeon and urologist. The use of the urologic resectoscope should prove to be a useful addition in the surgeon's armamentarium in a selected number of patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1979 PMID: 84407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Gynecol Obstet ISSN: 0039-6087