Literature DB >> 8439225

Gender differences in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A multihospital, community-based perspective.

P R Pagley1, J Yarzebski, R Goldberg, Z Chen, D Chiriboga, P Dalen, J Gurwitz, J S Alpert, J M Gore.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As part of a community-wide study examining temporal trends in the incidence and survival rates of acute myocardial infarction, we examined differences between the sexes in overall utilization rates and changes over time, therein, of various therapies used in the management of acute myocardial infarction.
DESIGN: Nonconcurrent prospective study. PATIENTS: Three thousand three hundred sixty-one men and 2119 women hospitalized with validated acute myocardial infarction in 16 hospitals in the Worcester, Mass, metropolitan area during 1975, 1978, 1981, 1984, 1986, 1988, and 1990.
RESULTS: After controlling, by means of a logistic regression analysis, for a variety of patient-related factors that could affect physician prescribing patterns, women were significantly more likely to receive diuretics during hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, whereas men were significantly more likely to receive antiplatelet agents, lidocaine, and other antiarrhythmic agents. No statistically significant differences were seen between men and women with regard to the use of anticoagulants, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin, nitrates, and thrombolytic agents. Marked increases over time (1975 through 1990) were seen in the use of anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, lidocaine, and nitrates in each of the sexes, while declines were seen in the use of digoxin and diuretics. Use of thrombolytic therapy increased between 1986 and 1990, whereas use of calcium channel blockers decreased over this period for both men and women.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this multihospital, population-based, observational study suggest that physician practice patterns in the pharmacologic treatment of men and women hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction are very similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8439225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  8 in total

Review 1.  A two way view of gender bias in medicine.

Authors:  M T Ruiz; L M Verbrugge
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Changes in rates of beta-blocker use in community hospital patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Adesuwa B Olomu; Ralph E Watson; Azfar-e-Alam Siddiqi; Francesca C Dwamena; Barbara A McIntosh; Peter Vasilenko; Joel Kupersmith; Margaret M Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The importance of study design strategies in gender bias research: the case of respiratory disease management in primary care.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Ruiz-Cantero; Elena Ronda; Carlos Alvarez-Dardet
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Beta blocker use in the treatment of community hospital patients discharged after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S H Sial; M Malone; J L Freeman; R Battiola; J Nachodsky; J S Goodwin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Gender differences in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Oliver Koeth; Ralf Zahn; Tobias Heer; Timm Bauer; Claus Juenger; Bärbel Klein; Anselm Kai Gitt; Jochen Senges; Uwe Zeymer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 5.460

6.  Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: does age or race matter?

Authors:  Carol R Regueiro; Nikita Gill; Alison Hart; Linda Crawshaw; Teresa Hentosz; Richard P Shannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Neighborhood socioeconomic status, Medicaid coverage and medical management of myocardial infarction: atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) community surveillance.

Authors:  Randi E Foraker; Kathryn M Rose; Eric A Whitsel; Chirayath M Suchindran; Joy L Wood; Wayne D Rosamond
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Do physician outcome judgments and judgment biases contribute to inappropriate use of treatments? Study protocol.

Authors:  Jamie C Brehaut; Roy Poses; Kaveh G Shojania; Alison Lott; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Elise Bassin; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 7.327

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.