Literature DB >> 8438224

Strategies for the avoidance of bacterial contamination of blood components.

B B Barrett1, J W Andersen, K C Anderson.   

Abstract

Gram staining and bacterial culturing methods were used to determine the incidence of bacterial contamination of cellular blood components at the time of transfusion reactions. Over a 5-year period, 2208 (4.3%) of 51,278 transfusions were complicated by reactions. Overall bacterial contamination occurred in 5 (0.03%) of 17,928 transfusions of single-donor apheresis platelets, 1 (0.14%) of 712 transfusions of pooled random-donor platelet concentrates, 1 (0.003%) of 31,385 transfusions of red cells, and 0 of 1253 transfusions of fresh-frozen plasma. Gram staining done at the time of positive cultures was positive in three of six cases. Although six of seven recipients of contaminated components suffered no clinical sequelae, contaminated transfusions may have been a contributing cause of death in one case. Attempts were made to avoid the transfusion of contaminated cellular blood components by performing routine bacterial cultures: 0 of 341 quality control cultures were positive. To avoid the transfusion of contaminated platelets by identifying bacteria, Gram staining was performed in all single-donor apheresis platelet units collected on open systems and daily in platelets stored > 48 hours: 8 (0.15%) of 5334 smears done on 3829 platelet units were interpreted as positive, and those units were not transfused, but only two of eight units were culture positive. These studies suggest that bacterial contamination can result in adverse clinical sequelae in transfusion recipients and that both culturing and Gram staining are poor methods of screening for contaminated units. More sensitive and specific methods of generalized screening for bacterial contamination are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8438224     DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33393174449.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  7 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of the risk of bacterial contamination of blood components through diversion of the first part of the donation of blood and blood components.

Authors:  Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Liviana Catalano; Vanessa Piccinini; Simonetta Pupella; Giuliano Grazzini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Effects of storage temperature on hematopoietic stability and microbial safety of BM aspirates.

Authors:  S Hahn; W Sireis; K Hourfar; D Karpova; K Dauber; V A J Kempf; E Seifried; M Schmidt; H Bönig
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Transfusion-associated bacterial sepsis.

Authors:  S J Wagner; L I Friedman; R Y Dodd
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Hemostatic strategies for traumatic and surgical bleeding.

Authors:  Adam M Behrens; Michael J Sikorski; Peter Kofinas
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Stored Canine Whole Blood Units: What is the Real Risk of Bacterial Contamination?

Authors:  A Miglio; V Stefanetti; M T Antognoni; K Cappelli; S Capomaccio; M Coletti; F Passamonti
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Haemovigilance of reactions associated with red blood cell transfusion: comparison across 17 Countries.

Authors:  M A M Rogers; J M Rohde; N Blumberg
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.144

Review 7.  Access technique and its problems in parenteral nutrition - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 9.

Authors:  K W Jauch; W Schregel; Z Stanga; S C Bischoff; P Brass; W Hartl; S Muehlebach; E Pscheidl; P Thul; O Volk
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.