Literature DB >> 8437438

The variability of organ weight background data in rats.

E Gur1, T Waner.   

Abstract

The variability of organ weight data in a series of 5 control groups of Sprague-Dawley rats was studied. Differences in body weight and organ weight data were detected between the studies. Attempts to reduce the variability of organ weights by using analysis of covariance or organ to brain weight ratios were only partially successful. Factors which may influence animals under controlled conditions and result in variability between studies are discussed. It is concluded that caution is needed when considering the use of organ weight background data as a means of comparison. The findings are in agreement with other fields of study in toxicological testing, and emphasize the importance of using a concurrent control for the purpose of comparison of data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8437438     DOI: 10.1258/002367793781082368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  6 in total

1.  A hybrid model to evaluate the impact of active uptake transport on hepatic distribution of atorvastatin in rats.

Authors:  Priyanka Kulkarni; Ken Korzekwa; Swati Nagar
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.908

2.  Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation.

Authors:  Bernhard Voelkl; Naomi S Altman; Anders Forsman; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Jessica Gurevitch; Ivana Jaric; Natasha A Karp; Martien J Kas; Holger Schielzeth; Tom Van de Casteele; Hanno Würbel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Relationship of Gabapentin in a CFA-induced Inflammatory Hyperalgesia Rat Model.

Authors:  Malte Selch Larsen; Ron Keizer; Gordon Munro; Arne Mørk; René Holm; Rada Savic; Mads Kreilgaard
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Biological Characteristics of Captive Chinese Wuzhishan Minipigs (Sus scrofa).

Authors:  Fangui Min; Jinchun Pan; Xilong Wang; Rui'ai Chen; Fengguo Wang; Shuming Luo; Jiancong Ye
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2014-08-20

5.  Preclinical Evaluation of the Antihypertensive Effect of an Aqueous Extract of Anogeissus leiocarpa (DC) Guill et Perr. Bark of Trunk in L-NAME-Induced Hypertensive Rat.

Authors:  Lazare Belemnaba; Mathieu Nitiéma; Sylvain Ilboudo; Gueswindé Geoffroy Ouédraogo; Noufou Ouédraogo; Mohamed Bonewendé Belemlilga; Souleymane Compaoré; Salfo Ouédraogo; Sylvin Ouédraogo
Journal:  J Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2021-08-07

6.  Change trends of organ weight background data in sprague dawley rats at different ages.

Authors:  Ying Piao; Yunen Liu; Xiaodong Xie
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 1.628

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.