Literature DB >> 8437195

Reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale when used by emergency physicians and paramedics.

J J Menegazzi1, E A Davis, A N Sucov, P M Paris.   

Abstract

We sought to determine the reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) when used by emergency physicians and paramedics. We performed a prospective sequential trial in a classroom setting, with subjects blinded to others' scoring. Nineteen university-affiliated emergency physicians and 41 professional paramedics from an urban EMS system voluntarily participated. Participants viewed four videotaped scenes in which a patient is assessed by a paramedic. The first three scenes represented severe, intermediate, and no/mild alteration in level of consciousness (LOC). The findings in the fourth scene were identical to the first, allowing determination of intrarater reliability. The Kappa statistic was used to determine interrater reliability; the reliability coefficient determined intrarater reliability. Kappa was significant (p < 0.0001) for severe (kappa = 0.48), intermediate (kappa = 0.34), and no/mild (kappa = 0.85) conditions. Intrarater reliability (r1,2) for emergency physicians was 0.66 (p < 0.01) and for paramedics was 0.63 (p < 0.01). The GCS shows statistically significant reliability (i.e., significant agreement) between emergency physicians and emergency medical technician-paramedics. It also has a significant level of intrarater reliability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8437195     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199301000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  17 in total

1.  Effect of the modified Glasgow Coma Scale score criteria for mild traumatic brain injury on mortality prediction: comparing classic and modified Glasgow Coma Scale score model scores of 13.

Authors:  Jorge Humberto Mena; Alvaro Ignacio Sanchez; Andres M Rubiano; Andrew B Peitzman; Jason L Sperry; Maria Isabel Gutierrez; Juan Carlos Puyana
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-11

Review 2.  Evaluation of coma: a critical appraisal of popular scoring systems.

Authors:  Joshua Kornbluth; Anish Bhardwaj
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 3.  The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review.

Authors:  Florence C M Reith; Ruben Van den Brande; Anneliese Synnot; Russell Gruen; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review.

Authors:  David S Rosen; R Loch Macdonald
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  The role of cardiac troponin I in prognostication of patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Stephen S Cai; Brandon W Bonds; Peter F Hu; Deborah M Stein
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.313

6.  Validation of a new coma scale, the FOUR score, in the emergency department.

Authors:  Latha G Stead; Eelco F M Wijdicks; Anjali Bhagra; Rahul Kashyap; M Fernanda Bellolio; David L Nash; Sailaja Enduri; Raquel Schears; Bamlet William
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  The FOUR score and GCS as predictors of outcome after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Molly McNett; Shelly Amato; Anastasia Gianakis; Dawn Grimm; Sue Ann Philippbar; Josie Belle; Cristina Moran
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 8.  Neurocritical care nursing research priorities.

Authors:  D M Olson; M M McNett; S Livesay; P D Le Roux; J I Suarez; C Bautista
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  External validation of the ICH score.

Authors:  Jennifer L Clarke; S Claiborne Johnston; Mary Farrant; Richard Bernstein; David Tong; J Claude Hemphill
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Knowledge of Glasgow coma scale by air-rescue physicians.

Authors:  Catherine Heim; Patrick Schoettker; Nicolas Gilliard; Donat R Spahn
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.