Literature DB >> 8436985

Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement.

J R Davey1, D O O'Connor, D W Burke, W H Harris.   

Abstract

The magnitude of the offset of the femoral prosthesis strongly influences the mechanics of the hip following a total hip arthroplasty. An increased offset increases the moment arm of the abductor muscles. This reduces the abductor force required for normal gait and, consequently, reduces the resultant force across the hip joint. These factors are advantageous. However, increased offset also increases the bending moment on the implant, which could adversely increase the strain in the medial cement mantle. To evaluate the relative advantages and disadvantages of these conflicting results of increasing the offset of the femoral component the authors measured in vitro in cadaver femora the effect of differing offsets of the femoral component on strain in the cement mantle. After testing the intact femora, the authors cemented femoral prostheses in place and quantified the abductor force, resultant force, and strain in the cement mantle under loading conditions simulating single limb stance at different femoral offset levels. The reduction in both abductor and resultant force was substantial with increased femoral component offset, but the strain in the cement of the proximal medial portion of the cement mantle was not significantly increased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8436985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  A study of femoral offset in the South Indian population and its clinical implications in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gautam Kumar; Mohamed Jisam; Jacob Varghese; Julio C Kandathil; Bipin Theruvil
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-10-04

2.  Morbid obesity may increase dislocation in total hip patients: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Jacob M Elkins; Matej Daniel; Douglas R Pedersen; Bhupinder Singh; H John Yack; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Design-related risk factors for revision of primary cemented stems.

Authors:  Truike M Thien; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  [Change of offset after implantation of hip alloarthroplasties].

Authors:  J Jerosch; S Funken
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Influence of prosthesis design and implantation technique on implant stresses after cementless revision THR.

Authors:  Markus O Heller; Manav Mehta; William R Taylor; Dong-Yeong Kim; Andrew Speirs; Georg N Duda; Carsten Perka
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  The impact of stem fixation method on Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fracture management.

Authors:  Katherine Wang; Eustathios Kenanidis; Zakareya Gamie; Khurram Suleman; Mark Miodownik; Mahsa Avadi; David Horne; Jonathan Thompson; Eleftherios Tsiridis; Mehran Moazen
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2022-01-06

7.  Fifteen-year results of precoated femoral stem in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dong Hun Suh; Ho Hyun Yun; Sung Kwang Chun; Won Yong Shon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-05-15

8.  A clinical comparative study of anatomic parameters before and after total hip replacement on congenital dysplasia.

Authors:  Ziqiang Huang; Yonggang Zhou; Wei Chai; Weiping Ji; Guopeng Cui; Miaoqun Ma; Yin Zhu
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-07-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.