Literature DB >> 8434907

Evaluation of commercial presence-absence test kits for detection of total coliforms, Escherichia coli, and other indicator bacteria.

J A Clark1, A H el-Shaarawi.   

Abstract

Evaluations of several commercial presence-absence (P-A) test kits were performed over a 6-month period in 1990 by using the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) P-A test for comparison. The general principles of the multiple-tube fermentation technique formed the basis for conducting the product evaluations. Each week, a surface water sample was diluted and inoculated into 25 99-ml dilution blanks for each of three dilutions. The inoculated dilution blanks from each dilution series were randomly sorted into sets of five. Three of these sets were inoculated into the P-A test kits or vice versa, as required. The other two sets were passed through membrane filters, and one set of five membrane filters was placed onto m-Endo agar LES to give replicate total coliform counts and the other set was placed onto m-TEC agar to give replicate fecal coliform results. A statistical analysis of the results was performed by a modified logistic transform method, which provided an improved way to compare binary data obtained from the different test kits. The comparative test results showed that three of the four commercial products tested gave very good levels of recovery and that the fourth commercial product gave only fair levels of recovery when the data were compared with the data from MOE P-A tests and membrane filter tests. P-A bottles showing positive results after 18 h of incubation that were subcultured immediately in ECMUG tubes frequently could be confirmed as containing total coliforms, fecal coliforms, or Escherichia coli after 6 h of incubation; thus, the total incubation time was only 24 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8434907      PMCID: PMC202116          DOI: 10.1128/aem.59.2.380-388.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  13 in total

1.  Total coliform detection in drinking water: comparison of membrane filtration with Colilert and Coliquik.

Authors:  B H Olson; D L Clark; B B Milner; M H Stewart; R L Wolfe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evaluation of the Autoanalysis Colilert test for detection and enumeration of total coliforms.

Authors:  T C Covert; L C Shadix; E W Rice; J R Haines; R W Freyberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of membrane filter, multiple-fermentation-tube, and presence-absence techniques for detecting total coliforms in small community water systems.

Authors:  N J Jacobs; W L Zeigler; F C Reed; T A Stukel; E W Rice
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparison of Clark's presence-absence test and the membrane filter method for coliform detection in potable water samples.

Authors:  W O Pipes; H A Minnigh; B Moyer; M A Troy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Characterization of indicator bacteria in municipal raw water, drinking water, and new main water samples.

Authors:  J A Clark; C A Burger; L E Sabatinos
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Fluorogenic assays for immediate confirmation of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P C Feng; P A Hartman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Membrane filter method for enumerating Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A P Dufour; E R Strickland; V J Cabelli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparison of the presence-absence and membrane filter techniques for coliform detection in small, nonchlorinated water distribution systems.

Authors:  K Bancroft; E T Nelson; G W Childers
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with presence-absence techniques.

Authors:  S C Edberg; M J Allen; D B Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  A defined substrate technology for the enumeration of microbial indicators of environmental pollution.

Authors:  S C Edberg; M M Edberg
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct
View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of commercially available kits with standard methods for the detection of coliforms and Escherichia coli in foods.

Authors:  K Venkateswaran; A Murakoshi; M Satake
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Monitoring of fecal pollution in coastal waters by use of rapid enzymatic techniques.

Authors:  L Fiksdal; M Pommepuy; M P Caprais; I Midttun
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Antibiotic resistance patterns of coliforms isolated from six protected wetlands in the southeast of Spain.

Authors:  M A Gómez; J Gonzalez-López; C Calvo
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.099

4.  Spectrofluorometric assay for rapid detection of total and fecal coliforms from surface water.

Authors:  S J Park; E J Lee; D H Lee; S H Lee; S J Kim
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Development of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization as a Rapid, Accurate Method for Detecting Coliforms in Water Samples.

Authors:  Jong-Tar Kuo; Li-Li Chang; Chia-Yuan Yen; Teh-Hua Tsai; Yu-Chi Chang; Yu-Tang Huang; Ying-Chien Chung
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.