Literature DB >> 8434102

Factors associated with obtaining health screening among women of reproductive age.

L S Wilcox1, W D Mosher.   

Abstract

Death and disability associated with breast and cervical cancer and hypertension can be reduced by early detection and treatment. The authors examined the rates for having obtained a Papanicolaou (Pap) test or pelvic examination, a breast physical examination, and a blood pressure test within the last 12 months among women of reproductive age in the United States in 1988, as reported by the 8,450 women interviewed for the 1988 National Survey of Family Growth. Overall, the annual rates of screening for women ages 15-44 years for those tests were 67 percent for a Pap test or pelvic examination, 67 percent for a breast examination, and 82 percent for a blood pressure test. Standard recommendations for the frequency of screening and survey data were examined to see whether actual screening practice was consistent with those recommendations. More than 90 percent of women who had a family planning service visit within 12 months received each of the tests, regardless of who provided the service or who paid for the visit. Women who were not sexually active, women with little education or low income, American Indian women, Hispanic women, and women of Asian or Pacific Islander descent had lower rates of screening than others, regardless of their risk status. These findings strongly suggest that the likelihood of having obtained screening among women 15-44 years old is determined primarily by how often a woman uses health care, rather than by her risk of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8434102      PMCID: PMC1403334     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  15 in total

Review 1.  The health effects of oral contraceptives: misperceptions, controversies, and continuing good news.

Authors:  H B Peterson; N C Lee
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

Review 3.  Demographic, psychosocial, and medical correlates of Pap testing: a literature review.

Authors:  S A Norman; E O Talbott; L H Kuller; B R Krampe; P D Stolley
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Recent trends in cervix uteri cancer.

Authors:  S S Devesa; J L Young; L A Brinton; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Trends in routine screening examinations.

Authors:  D A Dawson; G E Hendershot; B Bloom
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Epidemiology of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  L A Brinton; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

8.  National trends in the use of preventive health care by women.

Authors:  D M Makuc; V M Freid; J C Kleinman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project: five-year summary report.

Authors:  L H Baker
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Probabilities of eventually developing or dying of cancer--United States, 1985.

Authors:  H Seidman; M H Mushinski; S K Gelb; E Silverberg
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  17 in total

1.  The role of cultural variables in breast self-examination and cervical cancer screening behavior in young Asian women living in the United States.

Authors:  T S Tang; L J Solomon; C J Yeh; J K Worden
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1999-10

2.  Factors important in promoting cervical cancer screening among Canadian women: findings from the 1996-97 National Population Health Survey (NPHS).

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider; S A Vik
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

3.  Cervical cancer among Hispanic women: assessing the impact on farmworkers.

Authors:  Faith Boucher; Marc B Schenker
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  2002-07

4.  Acculturation and breast cancer screening among Hispanic women in New York City.

Authors:  A S O'Malley; J Kerner; A E Johnson; J Mandelblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Breast and cervical cancer screening in a low-income managed care sample: the efficacy of physician letters and phone calls.

Authors:  P M Lantz; D Stencil; M T Lippert; S Beversdorf; L Jaros; P L Remington
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening. An international review.

Authors:  M C Fahs; S B Plichta; J S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Breast cancer screening in the United States and Canada, 1994: socioeconomic gradients persist.

Authors:  S J Katz; J K Zemencuk; T P Hofer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Breast cancer screening practices among first-generation immigrant muslim women.

Authors:  Memoona Hasnain; Usha Menon; Carol Estwing Ferrans; Laura Szalacha
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Over-the-counter oral contraceptives--an immodest proposal?

Authors:  D A Grimes
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  An examination of sociocultural factors associated with cervical cancer screening among low-income Latina immigrants of reproductive age.

Authors:  Isabel C Scarinci; Bettina M Beech; Kristen W Kovach; Terry L Bailey
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  2003-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.