Literature DB >> 8433647

Hypermnesia in free recall and cued recall.

D G Payne1, H A Hembrooke, J S Anastasi.   

Abstract

In three experiments, categorized lists and both free recall and cued recall tests were used to examine hypermnesia. In Experiment 1, materials were drawn from obvious and nonobvious categories in an attempt to vary the amount of relational processing at encoding. The study materials in Experiment 2 consisted of a long word list that comprised several exemplars from each of a number of common categories. In Experiment 3, a single exemplar was drawn from each of 45 categories. In each experiment, similar magnitudes of hypermnesia were obtained on free and cued recall tests. Examination of the specific items recalled across tests indicated that similar processes underlie the hypermnesic effect for both test conditions. Implications of the results for extant accounts of the hypermnesic effect are discussed. It is concluded that the dynamics of retrieval processes change in a systematic fashion across repeated tests and the retention interval following study and that an adequate account of the nature of these changes in retrieval dynamics is essential to our understanding of hypermnesia and related phenomena.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8433647     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

1.  Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression.

Authors:  W K ESTES
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-05       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Incubated reminiscence effects.

Authors:  S M Smith; E Vela
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-03

3.  Hypermnesia for high-imagery words: the effects of interpolated tasks.

Authors:  G A Shaw; D A Bekerian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-01

4.  The effect of response bias on recall performance, with some observations on processing bias.

Authors:  M H Erdelyi; J Finks; M B Feigin-Pfau
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1989-09

5.  Effects of item-specific and relational information on hypermnesic recall.

Authors:  S B Klein; J Loftus; J F Kihlstrom; R Aseron
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Eyewitnesses show hypermnesia for details about a violent event.

Authors:  E Scrivner; M A Safer
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1988-08

7.  Hypermnesia occurs in recall but not in recognition.

Authors:  D G Payne; H L Roediger
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1987

8.  Recognition hypermnesia: the growth of recognition memory (d') over time with repeated testing.

Authors:  M H Erdelyi; J B Stein
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1981-02

9.  Hypermnesia: the role of repeated testing.

Authors:  H L Roediger; D G Payne
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Recall criterion does not affect recall level or hypermnesia: a puzzle for generate/recognize theories.

Authors:  H L Roediger; D G Payne
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Hypermnesia: the role of multiple retrieval cues.

Authors:  H Otani; R L Widner; H L Whiteman; J P St Louis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

2.  Selective disruption of hypermnesia for pictures and words.

Authors:  D G Payne; J S Anastasi; J M Blackwell; M J Wenger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.