Literature DB >> 8432387

Minimum tissue size required for hydra regeneration.

H Shimizu1, Y Sawada, T Sugiyama.   

Abstract

Small tissue pieces were excised from wild-type polyps of Hydra magnipapillata, allowed to regenerate, and the size-dependent characteristics of head regeneration were examined. The excised tissue piece was initially a square flat sheet. This piece gradually rounded up and, within 24 hr after excision, turned into a "spherical shell" which had a continuous ectodermal layer outside, a continuous endodermal layer inside, and an empty cavity at the center. The smallest spherical shell that could be produced had a diameter of 0.2 mm and contained 270-300 epithelial cells. A tissue piece too small to form a spherical shell always disintegrated, presumably due to lack of an osmotic barrier between the tissue and the environment. Of the spherical shells with a diameter of 0.2 mm, about half (47%) regenerated a head in about 5.5 days, while the rest remained as spherical shells or disintegrated. With an increase in diameter, the regeneration percentage increased, and regeneration time decreased. Similar size-dependent characteristics were also observed in a computer simulation study of regeneration based on the reaction-diffusion mechanism (Gierer and Meinhardt, Kybernetik 12, 30-39, 1972). These observations are consistent with the view that two independent factors are involved in determining the minimum tissue size for regeneration. One is the amount of tissue required to form a spherical shell. A tissue piece too small to form a spherical shell cannot survive and, hence, cannot regenerate. The other may be the reaction-diffusion mechanism. A pattern might not be formed below a critical limit size set by this mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8432387     DOI: 10.1006/dbio.1993.1028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  17 in total

1.  Whole-body protochordate regeneration from totipotent blood cells.

Authors:  B Rinkevich; Z Shlemberg; L Fishelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mechanogenetic coupling of Hydra symmetry breaking and driven Turing instability model.

Authors:  Jordi Soriano; Sten Rüdiger; Pramod Pullarkat; Albrecht Ott
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  An osmoregulatory basis for shape oscillations in regenerating hydra.

Authors:  Michael Kücken; Jordi Soriano; Pramod A Pullarkat; Albrecht Ott; Ernesto M Nicola
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Mouth Function Determines the Shape Oscillation Pattern in Regenerating Hydra Tissue Spheres.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Tapan Goel; Kate Khazoyan; Ziad Sabry; Heng J Quan; Patrick H Diamond; Eva-Maria S Collins
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Deep sequencing reveals unique small RNA repertoire that is regulated during head regeneration in Hydra magnipapillata.

Authors:  Srikar Krishna; Aparna Nair; Sirisha Cheedipudi; Deepak Poduval; Jyotsna Dhawan; Dasaradhi Palakodeti; Yashoda Ghanekar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Generic injuries are sufficient to induce ectopic Wnt organizers in Hydra.

Authors:  Jack F Cazet; Adrienne Cho; Celina E Juliano
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Remodeling the model organism: matrix metalloproteinase functions in invertebrates.

Authors:  Andrea Page-McCaw
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 8.  Aging and longevity in the simplest animals and the quest for immortality.

Authors:  Ronald S Petralia; Mark P Mattson; Pamela J Yao
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 10.895

Review 9.  Stem cell dynamics in Cnidaria: are there unifying principles?

Authors:  David A Gold; David K Jacobs
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 10.  Alternative Animal Models of Aging Research.

Authors:  Susanne Holtze; Ekaterina Gorshkova; Stan Braude; Alessandro Cellerino; Philip Dammann; Thomas B Hildebrandt; Andreas Hoeflich; Steve Hoffmann; Philipp Koch; Eva Terzibasi Tozzini; Maxim Skulachev; Vladimir P Skulachev; Arne Sahm
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.