Literature DB >> 8431138

Cerebral morphologic distinctions between Williams and Down syndromes.

T L Jernigan1, U Bellugi, E Sowell, S Doherty, J R Hesselink.   

Abstract

Neurobehavioral studies of Williams syndrome (WS) and Down syndrome (DS) have revealed distinct profiles of cognitive strengths and weaknesses. In a previous report, we described several gross brain morphologic distinctions on magnetic resonance images between these two disorders. While the observed cerebral hypoplasia was of equal degree in the two groups, cerebellar size was entirely normal in the subjects with WS but dramatically reduced in subjects with DS. In WS, paleocerebellar vermal lobules subtended a smaller area on midsagittal sections, but neocerebellar lobules were actually larger. These results suggested important distinctions between WS and DS in terms of the action and anatomic targets of factors that alter brain development in these syndromes. The present study extends the earlier findings by focusing in detail on the morphologic features of the cerebral hemispheres, particularly cerebral gray matter. The results suggest that some frontal and temporal limbic structures are relatively preserved in WS, while some basal ganglia and diencephalic structures are relatively preserved in DS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8431138     DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540020062019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Neurol        ISSN: 0003-9942


  24 in total

Review 1.  Insights into brain development from neurogenetic syndromes: evidence from fragile X syndrome, Williams syndrome, Turner syndrome and velocardiofacial syndrome.

Authors:  E Walter; P K Mazaika; A L Reiss
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  MRI assessment of superior temporal gyrus in Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Adriana Sampaio; Nuno Sousa; Montse Férnandez; Cristiana Vasconcelos; Martha E Shenton; Oscar F Gonçalves
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 3.  Down syndrome: the brain in trisomic mode.

Authors:  Mara Dierssen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Copy number variants at Williams-Beuren syndrome 7q11.23 region.

Authors:  Giuseppe Merla; Nicola Brunetti-Pierri; Lucia Micale; Carmela Fusco
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Structural brain alterations of Down's syndrome in early childhood evaluation by DTI and volumetric analyses.

Authors:  Hediye Pınar Gunbey; Meltem Ceyhan Bilgici; Kerim Aslan; Arzu Ceylan Has; Methiye Gonul Ogur; Aslıhan Alhan; Lutfi Incesu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Sleep problems and recall memory in children with Down syndrome and typically developing controls.

Authors:  Angela F Lukowski; Emily M Slonecker; Helen M Milojevich
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2019-11-16

7.  Short-term memory deficits are not uniform in Down and Williams syndromes.

Authors:  Stefano Vicari; Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  Pediatric Brain Development in Down Syndrome: A Field in Its Infancy.

Authors:  Taralee Hamner; Manisha D Udhnani; Karol Z Osipowicz; Nancy Raitano Lee
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Gene network disruptions and neurogenesis defects in the adult Ts1Cje mouse model of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Chelsee A Hewitt; King-Hwa Ling; Tobias D Merson; Ken M Simpson; Matthew E Ritchie; Sarah L King; Melanie A Pritchard; Gordon K Smyth; Tim Thomas; Hamish S Scott; Anne K Voss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Gait function in adults with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Darren R Hocking; Nicole J Rinehart; Jennifer L McGinley; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.