Literature DB >> 8430697

Asymptotic properties of affected-sib-pair linkage analysis.

P Holmans1.   

Abstract

The likelihood-ratio method for affected-sib-pair analysis, introduced by Risch, is a powerful method for detecting linkage when the marker is not perfectly polymorphic, as is often the case. The power of this method can be improved by restricting maximization to the set of possible haplotype-sharing probabilities--denoted the "possible triangle" method. The asymptotic distributions of the resulting distributions are derived, enabling test criteria to be found for any required test size (i.e., the probability of falsely detecting linkage when none exists) and enabling p values to be assigned to results. The criteria were found to be approximately constant when the PIC of the marker varies, making them applicable to any marker. The asymptotic power approximations were used to investigate the relative performance of pairs with typed parents, relative to those without, by comparing the sample sizes necessary for a given power. Under certain circumstances, typing the parents proved to be inefficient, even when PIC was low.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8430697      PMCID: PMC1682211     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  17 in total

1.  The general purpose sibpair linkage test.

Authors:  L S PENROSE
Journal:  Ann Eugen       Date:  1953-09

2.  The affected sib-pair method using identity by state relations.

Authors:  K Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.

Authors:  W C Blackwelder; R C Elston
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Frequency in relatives for an all-or-none trait.

Authors:  J W James
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 1.670

Review 5.  The genetics of susceptibility to multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  R S Spielman; N Nathanson
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Inference on inheritance of disease using repetitions of HLA haplotypes in affected siblings.

Authors:  J R Green; H C Low; J C Woodrow
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  The generalized sib pair IBD distribution: its use in the detection of linkage.

Authors:  B K Suarez; J Rice; T Reich
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.670

8.  The affected sib method. IV. Sib trios.

Authors:  H Payami; G Thomson; U Motro; E J Louis; E Hudes
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.670

Review 9.  Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.

Authors:  D Botstein; R L White; M Skolnick; R W Davis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Polymorphic markers of human T-cell receptor alpha and beta genes. Family studies and comparison of frequencies in healthy individuals and patients with multiple sclerosis and myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  J R Oksenberg; C N Gaiser; L L Cavalli-Sforza; L Steinman
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.850

View more
  95 in total

1.  A general conditional-logistic model for affected-relative-pair linkage studies.

Authors:  J M Olson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Fine mapping of the chromosome 3p susceptibility locus in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  J Hampe; N J Lynch; S Daniels; S Bridger; A J Macpherson; P Stokkers; A Forbes; J E Lennard-Jones; C G Mathew; M E Curran; S Schreiber
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Model-free linkage analysis with covariates confirms linkage of prostate cancer to chromosomes 1 and 4.

Authors:  K A Goddard; J S Witte; B K Suarez; W J Catalona; J M Olson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.

Authors:  H J Cordell; G C Wedig; K B Jacobs; R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.

Authors:  H H Göring; J D Terwilliger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-23       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Power comparison of parametric and nonparametric linkage tests in small pedigrees.

Authors:  P C Sham; M W Lin; J H Zhao; D Curtis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-04-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Linkage analysis in the presence of errors I: complex-valued recombination fractions and complex phenotypes.

Authors:  H H Göring; J D Terwilliger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Multipoint linkage analysis of the pseudoautosomal regions, using affected sibling pairs.

Authors:  J Dupuis; P Van Eerdewegh
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-06-26       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The relationship between the sibling recurrence-risk ratio and genotype relative risk.

Authors:  B A Rybicki; R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  All LODs are not created equal.

Authors:  D R Nyholt
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.