Literature DB >> 8426945

Treatment of lower extremity injuries with orthotic shoe inserts. An overview.

M L Gross1, R C Napoli.   

Abstract

Orthotic shoe inserts are very effective in providing symptomatic relief of lower extremity complaints in running athletes. Inserts adjust the biomechanical-variables associated with running injuries and reduce the effect of high stresses produced by running activities. Orthotic treatment is based on an understanding of complex coupling of rotation of the lower extremity with pronation and supination of the subtalar joint. Orthotic fabrication is initiated by determining the neutral position of the foot and obtaining an accurate cast of this position. Successful treatment with orthotic shoe inserts is dependent on careful evaluation of the runner and formulation of a properly fitted orthosis. When correctly utilised, orthotic shoe inserts are beneficial for a broad range of disorders experienced by runners. Since biomechanical deficits may be related to injuries along the entire lower extremity, specific diagnoses may be of lesser indication; however, accurate identification of the underlying biomechanical deficit is critical. Problems related to excessive or prolonged pronation are most amenable to orthotic treatment. While treatment of the cavus foot with orthotic shoe inserts is sometimes worthwhile, the clinician should be aware of limited success in this instance. Finally, orthotics are only one facet in the overall treatment plan for injured running athletes. Most overuse syndromes will respond to rest, training modification, and a change in the running surface or shoe. Equally important is the use of a proper conditioning and stretching programme both for injury prevention and for treatment of specific injuries. Treatment with orthotic shoe inserts should not be used as a substitute for any of these approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8426945     DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199315010-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Med        ISSN: 0112-1642            Impact factor:   11.136


  15 in total

1.  An overview of overuse syndromes in distance runners.

Authors:  G A Sheehan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  The practical biomechanics of running.

Authors:  R S Adelaar
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  On the epidemiology of running injuries. The 1984 Bern Grand-Prix study.

Authors:  B Marti; J P Vader; C E Minder; T Abelin
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Injuries in runners.

Authors:  J Lysholm; J Wiklander
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Techniques in the evaluation and treatment of the injured runner.

Authors:  D M Brody
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.472

Review 6.  Running injuries.

Authors:  D M Brody
Journal:  Clin Symp       Date:  1980

7.  Running symposium.

Authors:  R A Mann; D E Baxter; L D Lutter
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1981-01

8.  Foot orthotic devices to modify selected aspects of lower extremity mechanics.

Authors:  B T Bates; L R Osternig; B Mason; L S James
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1979 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Prevention of common overuse injuries by the use of shock absorbing insoles. A prospective study.

Authors:  M P Schwellnus; G Jordaan; T D Noakes
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Injuries to runners: a study of entrants to a 10,000 meter race.

Authors:  S J Jacobs; B L Berson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  6 in total

1.  Chronic leg pain in a division ii field hockey player: a case report.

Authors:  Julie Snowden; Jonathan A Becker; Joseph A Brosky; Charles Hazle
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-02

2.  Deformity or dysfunction? Osteopathic manipulation of the idiopathic cavus foot: A clinical suggestion.

Authors:  Christopher Kevin Wong; Adi Gidali; Valerie Harris
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-02

3.  Arch height and maximum rearfoot eversion during jogging in 2 static neutral positions.

Authors:  Sae Yong Lee; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The effects of foot orthosis on the gait ability of college students in their 20s with flat feet.

Authors:  Kyo Chul Seo; Kwang Yong Park
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-10-28

5.  Impact of wearing a functional foot orthotic on the ankle joint angle of frontal surface of young adults with flatfoot.

Authors:  KyoChul Seo; SeungHwan Park; KwangYong Park
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-05-16

6.  Effects of wearing functional foot orthotic on pelvic angle among college students in their 20s with flatfoot.

Authors:  KwangYong Park
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-03-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.