Literature DB >> 8425641

Earlier testing after vasectomy, based on the absence of motile sperm.

I S Edwards1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the results of postvasectomy testing when clearance was based on the absence of motile sperm and to compare them with regimens based on complete azoospermia.
DESIGN: A review of 2,260 seminal assay results from 3,178 consecutive vasectomies performed during a 17-year period.
SETTING: An outpatient vasectomy service in a private group practice in suburban Sydney.
RESULTS: Clearance was given sooner and with less testing than with other reported regimens, without loss of reliability.
CONCLUSIONS: Testing can be done 4 weeks after vasectomy, regardless of the number of postvasectomy ejaculations. If specimens are examined within 12 hours of collection, clearance may safely be given if motile sperm are absent. Repeat tests are essential if any motile sperm remain but are not needed if only nonmotile sperm are found.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; Biology; Contraception; Contraception Failure; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Genitalia; Germ Cells; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Laboratory Procedures; Male Sterilization; Measurement; Oceania; Physiology; Recanalization; Reliability; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Sperm Count; Sperm Transport; Spermatozoa; Sterilization, Sexual; Urogenital System; Vasectomy

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8425641     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55706-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  British Andrology Society guidelines for the assessment of post vasectomy semen samples (2002).

Authors:  P Hancock; E McLaughlin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Vasectomy update 2010.

Authors:  Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Trends in vasectomy. Analysis of one teaching practice.

Authors:  J L Reynolds
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  CUA guideline: Vasectomy.

Authors:  Armand Zini; John Grantmyre; Peter Chan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Update on vasectomy protocol.

Authors:  Doron S Stember; Harris M Nagler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  UPDATE - 2022 Canadian Urological Association best practice report: Vasectomy.

Authors:  Armand Zini; John Grantmyre; Victor Chow; Peter Chan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.052

7.  Impact of the 2012 American Urological Association vasectomy guidelines on post-vasectomy outcomes.

Authors:  Robert M Coward; Niraj G Badhiwala; Jason R Kovac; Ryan P Smith; Dolores J Lamb; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Frequency and patterns of early recanalization after vasectomy.

Authors:  Michel Labrecque; Melissa Hays; Mario Chen-Mok; Mark A Barone; David Sokal
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Vasectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michel Labrecque; Caroline Dufresne; Mark A Barone; Karine St-Hilaire
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Effectiveness of vasectomy using cautery.

Authors:  Mark A Barone; Belinda Irsula; Mario Chen-Mok; David C Sokal
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.