Literature DB >> 8425415

How accurate is endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer?

U Herzog1, M von Flüe, P Tondelli, J P Schuppisser.   

Abstract

In rectal cancer, depth of infiltration and metastatic involvement of lymph nodes are important prognostic factors. The correct choice of operative treatment depends on the extent of the disease. In a prospective study, the value of endorectal ultrasound in staging rectal cancer was evaluated, and factors affecting the method's accuracy are discussed. The overall accuracy in staging depth of infiltration was 89 percent. Overstaging occurred in 10.2 percent, understaging in 0.8 percent. Tumors of the lower rectum are incorrectly staged in 16.7 percent, whereas tumors of the middle and upper rectum had an incorrect staging in 6.3 percent (P < 0.001). Compared with computed tomography, endorectal sonography is the more accurate staging method (74.7 vs. 90.8 percent). In staging lymph nodes, the overall accuracy was 80.2 percent, sensitivity was 89.4 percent, specificity was 73.4 percent, positive predictive value (PPV) was 71.2 percent, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 90.4 percent. The staging accuracy depends on the size of the node. Endorectal ultrasound is a safe, inexpensive, and accurate staging method, in the assessment of both depth of infiltration and nodal status. The results are strongly related to the experience of the investigator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8425415     DOI: 10.1007/bf02051167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  31 in total

1.  Increased detection rate and potential prognostic impact of disseminated tumor cells in patients undergoing endorectal ultrasound for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Moritz Koch; Dalibor Antolovic; Peter Kienle; Johanna Horstmann; Christian Herfarth; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Jürgen Weitz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Multimodal imaging evaluation in staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Suk Hee Heo; Jin Woong Kim; Sang Soo Shin; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung-Keun Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Patterns of recurrence following pelvic exenteration and external radiotherapy for locally advanced primary rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  P Luna-Perez; S Delgado; S Labastida; N Ortiz; D Rodriguez; L Herrera
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in the loco-regional staging of patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Pietro Marone; Mario de Bellis; Valentina D'Angelo; Paolo Delrio; Valentina Passananti; Elena Di Girolamo; Giovanni Battista Rossi; Daniela Rega; Maura Claire Tracey; Alfonso Mario Tempesta
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-25

Review 5.  Rectal imaging: part 1, High-resolution MRI of carcinoma of the rectum at 3 T.

Authors:  Vivek Gowdra Halappa; Celia Pamela Corona Villalobos; Susanne Bonekamp; Susan L Gearhart; Jonathan Efron; Joseph Herman; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Endorectal ultrasound in the identification of rectal tumors for transanal endoscopic surgery: factors influencing its accuracy.

Authors:  Xavier Serra-Aracil; Ana Gálvez; Laura Mora-López; Pere Rebasa; Sheila Serra-Pla; Anna Pallisera-Lloveras; Carla Zerpa; Oriol Moreno; Salvador Navarro-Soto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Endoanal ultrasonography in the follow-up of anal carcinoma.

Authors:  U Herzog; M Boss; H P Spichtin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Local management of rectal neoplasia.

Authors:  John Touzios; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

9.  Prospective phase II study of preoperative short-course radiotherapy for rectal cancer with twice daily fractions of 2.9 Gy to a total dose of 29 Gy--long-term results.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Joern Wulf; Andreas Thalheimer; Daniel Wehner; Arnulf Thiede; Gottfried Müller; Marco Sailer; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Squamous cell cancer of the rectum.

Authors:  Tara Dyson; Peter V Draganov
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.