Literature DB >> 8424331

Mammographic findings in men with breast cancer.

D D Dershaw1, P I Borgen, B M Deutch, L Liberman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify the mammographic findings of breast cancer in men.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mammograms of 23 men with proved breast cancer (mean age, 63 years; range, 44-86 years) were retrospectively reviewed. Medical histories included gynecomastia in five, prior cancer in three, and radiation exposure in two. The most common signs were a mass in 13 and bloody nipple discharge in eight.
RESULTS: Carcinoma was evident mammographically as an uncalcified mass in 17 patients (74%) and as a mass with microcalcifications in two patients (9%). Three tumors were not evident on mammograms, including one that was obscured by gynecomastia. Tumors were largely subareolar (14/17, 82%), and all were ductal cancers, including six pure intraductal carcinomas.
CONCLUSION: Mammograms of men with breast cancer usually show an uncalcified subareolar mass, which may mimic or be obscured by gynecomastia. If calcifications are present, they may not have a pattern usually associated with malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8424331     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.160.2.8424331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

1.  The Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography and Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Male Breast Disease: A New Algorithm.

Authors:  Zehra H Adibelli; Ozgur Oztekin; Hakan Postaci; Adam Uslu
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Mammography and ultrasound in the evaluation of male breast disease.

Authors:  Rafaela Muñoz Carrasco; Marina Alvarez Benito; Elisa Muñoz Gomariz; José Luis Raya Povedano; María Martínez Paredes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A comparison of tumour size measurements with palpation, ultrasound and mammography in male breast cancer: first results of the prospective register study.

Authors:  Martin Streng; Atanas Ignatov; Mattea Reinisch; Serban-Dan Costa; Holm Eggemann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Rare case of metaplastic breast cancer in a man.

Authors:  Heather Katz; Hassaan Jafri; Thomas Dougherty; Yehuda Lebowicz
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-07

Review 5.  Mammography Findings of Male Breast Diseases.

Authors:  Kadihan Yalçın Şafak
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-07-01

Review 6.  Carcinoma of the male breast.

Authors:  J F De los Santos; T A Buchholz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-08

7.  Ductal carcinoma in situ in a 15-year-old boy with gynaecomastia: a case report.

Authors:  Michele Corroppolo; Elena Erculiani; Nicola Zampieri; Marta Gobbato; Francesco Saverio Camoglio; Luca Giacomello
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-07-05       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Efficiency of Imaging Modalities in Male Breast Disease: Can Ultrasound Give Additional Information for Assessment of Gynecomastia Evolution?

Authors:  Özgür Sarıca; A Nedim Kahraman; Enis Öztürk; Memik Teke
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-01-01

9.  Male Breast Cancer with Radiological and Histopathological Findings.

Authors:  Cennet Sahin; Burcin Agridag Ucpinar; Deniz Turkyilmaz Mut; Onur Yilmaz; Ramazan Ucak; Cemal Kaya; Canan Tanik
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2020-08-22

10.  A Clinicopathological Evaluation of Male Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Enver Ilhan; Bakir Bati; Ali Alemdar; Ali Coskun; Arsenal Sezgin; Mehmet Yildirim; Omer Engin; Mete Purten
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.860

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.