Literature DB >> 8424239

The use of ERCP in the management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

G C Vitale1, G M Larson, T J Wieman, W G Cheadle, F B Miller.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indications and results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for gallstone disease since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In our personal series of 410 consecutive cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we found 17 common bile duct (CBD) stones; seven were identified by preop ERCP, nine at laparoscopy by intraoperative cholangiography, and one postop by ERCP. We have performed preop ERCP in 21 patients (5.1%); CBD stones were found in seven. Our indications for preop ERCP were elevated liver function tests, dilatation of the common duct by ultrasound, or a history of jaundice/pancreatitis, and all stones were successfully removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy. At laparoscopic cholecystectomy nine patients were found to have stones; one was treated with laparoscopic methods, four with open CBD exploration, and four by postop endoscopic sphinecterotomy. Post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy, five patients underwent ERCP for pain or increased liver function tests suggestive of common duct stones. One of the five was found to have stones and these were successfully removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy. ERCP is very useful as a diagnostic and therapeutic modality in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients with suspected CBD stones. Elevated liver function tests and dilated CBD by ultrasound are the most accurate predictors of stones. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is a more effective route, at present, for stone removal than a laparoscopic approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8424239     DOI: 10.1007/bf00591228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  5 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the biliary endoscopist.

Authors:  P B Cotton; J Baillie; T N Pappas; W S Meyers
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Long-term follow-up after endoscopic management of retained and recurrent common duct stones.

Authors:  E Kullman; K Borch; G Liedberg
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1989-08

3.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients with intact gallbladders.

Authors:  D T Hansell; M A Millar; W R Murray; G R Gray; G Gillespie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients.

Authors:  G M Larson; G C Vitale; J Casey; J S Evans; G Gilliam; L Heuser; G McGee; M Rao; M J Scherm; C R Voyles
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  M E Arregui; C J Davis; A M Arkush; R F Nagan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy for stones by experts is safe, even in younger patients with normal ducts.

Authors:  P B Cotton; J E Geenen; S Sherman; J T Cunningham; D A Howell; D L Carr-Locke; N J Nickl; R H Hawes; G A Lehman; A Ferrari; A Slivka; D R Lichtenstein; J Baillie; P S Jowell; L M Lail; H Evangelou; J J Bosco; B L Hanson; B J Hoffman; S M Rahaman; R Male
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Sequential intraluminal endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment for bile duct stones associated with gallstones.

Authors:  G Zaninotto; M Costantini; M Rossi; M Anselmino; S Pianalto; D Oselladore; D Pizzato; L Norberto; E Ancona
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Factors predicting outcome after selective ERCP in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  G S Robertson; P R Johnson; B J Rathbone; A C Wicks; D M Lloyd; P S Veitch
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  More on ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S M Graham; J L Flowers
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  ERCP in association with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A strategy to minimize the number of unnecessary ERCPs.

Authors:  G Bonatsos; E Leandros; A Polydorou; A Romanos; N Dourakis; C Birbas; B Golematis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  ERCP in the era of laparoscopic biliary surgery. Experience with 407 patients.

Authors:  R Coppola; D D'Ugo; S Ciletti; M E Riccioni; L Cosentino; P Magistrelli; A Picciocchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Current management of common bile duct stones in northern Italy.

Authors:  M Morino; C Miglietta; R Brachet Contul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Selection criteria for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) in patients with gallstone disease.

Authors:  E Trondsen; B Edwin; O Reiertsen; H Fagertun; A R Rosseland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Appropriate management of common bile duct stones: a RAND Corporation/UCLA Appropriateness Method statistical analysis.

Authors:  Pablo Parra-Membrives; Daniel Díaz-Gómez; Román Vilegas-Portero; Máximo Molina-Linde; Lourdes Gómez-Bujedo; Juan Ramón Lacalle-Remigio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  J B Petelin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.