Literature DB >> 8424225

The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the operative experience of surgical residents.

D J Deziel1, K W Millikan, E D Staren, A Doolas, S G Economou.   

Abstract

The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on the operative experience of surgical residents was assessed in a series of 787 cholecystectomies. During an initial 18-month period, residents participated in LC as operating surgeon and as first assistant or camera operator in 33% and 97% of cases, respectively. Operative time, cholangiography rate, conversion rate, and complications were not adversely affected by resident operators. Residents performed 87% of concurrent planned open cholecystectomies (OC). In comparison to the 6 months preceding LC: (1) The mean number of resident OCs decreased significantly while the total number of resident cholecystectomies was unchanged; (2) the proportion of OCs performed by PGY5 residents significantly increased at the expense of junior resident cases. LC can be safely integrated into surgical resident training by standard methods as for open procedures. Although resident operative experience has been redistributed, initial experience does not suggest that qualification in open biliary surgery has been compromised.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8424225     DOI: 10.1007/bf00591230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  Training, credentialling, and granting of clinical privileges for laparoscopic general surgery.

Authors:  T L Dent
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  The Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Berci; J M Sackier
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Establishment of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy training program.

Authors:  R W Bailey; A L Imbembo; K A Zucker
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Threat or opportunity?

Authors:  R K Tompkins
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-10

6.  Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. A comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Open laparoscopy for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R J Fitzgibbons; S Schmid; R Santoscoy; S Tyndall; R Hinder; C J Filipi; J Jenkins; R J Fitzgibbons; G M Salerno
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-12

8.  Multipractice analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1,983 patients.

Authors:  G M Larson; G C Vitale; J Casey; J S Evans; G Gilliam; L Heuser; G McGee; M Rao; M J Scherm; C R Voyles
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; S B Edge; J Dix; M J Hyser; J B Hanks; R S Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Appraisal of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H A Graves; J F Ballinger; W J Anderson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  9 in total

1.  The cost of surgical training: analysis of operative time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M von Strauss Und Torney; S Dell-Kuster; R Mechera; R Rosenthal; I Langer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluation of real-time infrared intraoperative cholangiography in a porcine model.

Authors:  Jack J Liu; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Benjamin McHone; Nadeem Dhanani; Fred Gage; Peter A Pinto; Alexander M Gorbach; Eric Elster
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Impact of established skills in open surgery on the proficiency gain process for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel C Brown; Danilo Miskovic; Benjie Tang; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on surgical training.

Authors:  N J Shaper; M Harrison; T Bates
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Survey on Torino courses. The impact of a two-day practical course on apprenticeship and diffusion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Italy.

Authors:  M Morino; V Festa; C Garrone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Our experience with early integration of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in surgical residency training.

Authors:  R Sefr; J Ochmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Resident training in single-incision compared with traditional cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Shaun C Daly; Elizabeth A Hooper; Daniel Rinewalt; Jonathan A Myers; Keith W Millikan; Minh Luu
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Implications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgical residency training.

Authors:  D Böckler; J Geoghegan; M Klein; Q Weissmann; M Turan; L Meyer; J Scheele
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.