Literature DB >> 8423258

Vibrotactile adaptation enhances amplitude discrimination.

A K Goble1, M Hollins.   

Abstract

Human psychophysical detection and amplitude discrimination thresholds for 25-Hz sinusoidal vibrations were measured on the thenar eminence using two-interval forced-choice tracking, in the unadapted state and following exposure to 25-Hz adapting stimuli representing a range of amplitudes (5-25 dB SL). As expected, detection threshold was elevated 6 to 7 dB for each 10-dB increase in the adapting stimulus. In contrast, amplitude difference thresholds for 10 and 20 dB SL standard stimuli were generally lowest when the amplitude of the adapting stimulus was equal to the amplitude of the standard. The results indicate that while adaptation impairs detection of a liminal vibrotactile stimulus, it improves intensity discrimination of supraliminal stimuli that are close in amplitude to the adapting stimulus. The compatability between these results and a recently proposed model of cortical dynamics (Whitsel et al., 1989) suggests that cortical events may contribute significantly to the physiological basis of vibrotactile adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8423258     DOI: 10.1121/1.405621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Vibratory adaptation of cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; Y Y Leung; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A portable tactile sensory diagnostic device.

Authors:  V Tannan; R G Dennis; Z Zhang; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Tactile perception in adults with autism: a multidimensional psychophysical study.

Authors:  Carissa Cascio; Francis McGlone; Stephen Folger; Vinay Tannan; Grace Baranek; Kevin A Pelphrey; Gregory Essick
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-04-06

4.  Effects of adaptation on the capacity to differentiate simultaneously delivered dual-site vibrotactile stimuli.

Authors:  V Tannan; S Simons; R G Dennis; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber's Law.

Authors:  E Francisco; V Tannan; Z Zhang; J Holden; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Frequency-domain measurement of vibrotactile driving responses in first-order afferent populations.

Authors:  E F Kelly; D F McLaughlin; W J Dunseath; S Folger; F Jones; H K Hudnell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Discrimination of vibrotactile frequencies in a delayed pair comparison task.

Authors:  R J Sinclair; H Burton
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

8.  Adaptive shaping of cortical response selectivity in the vibrissa pathway.

Authors:  He J V Zheng; Qi Wang; Garrett B Stanley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Tactile frequency discrimination is enhanced by circumventing neocortical adaptation.

Authors:  Simon Musall; Wolfger von der Behrens; Johannes M Mayrhofer; Bruno Weber; Fritjof Helmchen; Florent Haiss
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Auditory and tactile frequency representations are co-embedded in modality-defined cortical sensory systems.

Authors:  Md Shoaibur Rahman; Kelly Anne Barnes; Lexi E Crommett; Mark Tommerdahl; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.