Literature DB >> 8420300

Risk of disease progression in asymptomatic multiple myeloma.

M A Dimopoulos1, A Moulopoulos, T Smith, K B Delasalle, R Alexanian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In recent years, increasing numbers of patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma have been diagnosed by chance and followed without any therapy. Those at risk for early or late disease progression should be distinguished in order to prevent complications. This study defined prognostic factors that would predict the need for early treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We followed 95 patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma without chemotherapy between 1974 and 1991. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine was conducted in 23% of patients with normal radiographs. An increase in serum myeloma protein to more than 50 g/L or new lytic bone lesions justified the institution of chemotherapy. Response to treatment and survival were assessed, and prognostic factors were defined for early or late disease progression by standard techniques.
RESULTS: The median time to progression in all patients was 26 months. The 25 patients with either a lytic bone lesion, or both serum peak greater than 30 g/L and Bence Jones proteinuria, had the shortest median time to progression of 10 months; the 27 patients without any harmful factor remained stable for a median of 61 months. MRI confirmed bone or marrow disease in half of the patients with normal radiographs and may assist in the prognostic staging. Despite the markedly different times of disease stability, the response rates and survival after chemotherapy were similar for all groups of patients.
CONCLUSION: Among asymptomatic patients with multiple myeloma, the extent of disease at diagnosis and the subsequent rate of disease evolution were major factors in the total survival time. These patients are a markedly heterogeneous group who may benefit from different approaches to treatment according to defined risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8420300     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90120-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  25 in total

1.  Genomic analysis of high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Lucía López-Corral; María Victoria Mateos; Luis A Corchete; María Eugenia Sarasquete; Javier de la Rubia; Felipe de Arriba; Juan-José Lahuerta; Ramón García-Sanz; Jesús F San Miguel; Norma C Gutiérrez
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Improvement of diagnostic confidence for detection of multiple myeloma involvement of the ribs by a new CT software generating rib unfolded images: Comparison with 5- and 1-mm axial images.

Authors:  Georg Homann; Katja Weisel; Deedar Farhad Mustafa; Hendrik Ditt; Konstantin Nikolaou; Marius Horger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and smoldering myeloma: new insights into pathophysiology and epidemiology.

Authors:  Ola Landgren
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2010

Review 4.  Whole-body MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging for the staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Julie C Dutoit; Koenraad L Verstraete
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  [Imaging in smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Past, present and future].

Authors:  M Bhutani; O Landgren
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Seven-year median time to progression with thalidomide for smoldering myeloma: partial response identifies subset requiring earlier salvage therapy for symptomatic disease.

Authors:  Bart Barlogie; Frits van Rhee; John D Shaughnessy; Joshua Epstein; Shmuel Yaccoby; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Klaus Hollmig; Yazan Alsayed; Antje Hoering; Jackie Szymonifka; Elias Anaissie; Nathan Petty; Naveen S Kumar; Geetika Srivastava; Bonnie Jenkins; John Crowley; Jerome B Zeldis
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Induction of a chronic disease state in patients with smoldering or indolent multiple myeloma by targeting interleukin 1{beta}-induced interleukin 6 production and the myeloma proliferative component.

Authors:  John A Lust; Martha Q Lacy; Steven R Zeldenrust; Angela Dispenzieri; Morie A Gertz; Thomas E Witzig; Shaji Kumar; Suzanne R Hayman; Stephen J Russell; Francis K Buadi; Susan M Geyer; Megan E Campbell; Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar; Philip R Greipp; Michael P Kline; Yuning Xiong; Laurie L Moon-Tasson; Kathleen A Donovan
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Bone remodelling in monoclonal gammopathies of uncertain significance, symptomatic and nonsymptomatic myeloma.

Authors:  M Laroche; M Attal; C Dromer
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Presenting signs and symptoms in multiple myeloma: high percentages of stage III among patients without apparent myeloma-associated symptoms.

Authors:  F Ong; J Hermans; E M Noordijk; P W Wijermans; J C Kluin-Nelemans
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 10.  Treatment strategies in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: current status.

Authors:  Hang Quach; H Miles Prince; Linda Mileshkin
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.