Literature DB >> 24927659

[Imaging in smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Past, present and future].

M Bhutani1, O Landgren.   

Abstract

CLINICAL ISSUE: Emerging clinical trial data support treatment of high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) upon diagnosis, and not only at the time of progression to symptomatic complications (multiple myeloma). Early detection of bone and/or bone marrow involvement by sensitive imaging modalities may help define SMM patients at a high risk of progression. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
METHODS: Current (2011) consensus guidelines recognize skeletal survey as a cornerstone modality for assessment of bone involvement at initial diagnosis and during follow-up of SMM. Skeletal survey has severe limitations related to underdetection of bone lesions and also provides no information on bone marrow abnormalities. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Modern imaging strategies such as fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/CT (FDG PET/CT) and MRI, in conjunction with functional innovations, provide improved estimates of global abnormalities in the bone marrow and bone compartments. These methods have the potential to objectively quantify early transformation from SMM to multiple myeloma. PERFORMANCE: Although frequently used for staging and risk prognostication in multiple myeloma, modern imaging techniques have only been evaluated to a limited extent in SMM. Scant data in SMM indicate the prognostic value of two or more MRI-detected focal bone marrow abnormalities, which, if present, predict rapid progression to multiple myeloma. Data evaluating the role of FDG PET/CT in detecting early bone marrow abnormalities as an aid to predicting risk or directing treatment in SMM is currently lacking. ACHIEVEMENTS: The superior specificity and sensitivity of modern imaging techniques compared to skeletal survey suggest that these should have a place in standard practice management of patients at a high risk of SMM progression. The model imaging of the future should be an all-in-one strategy offering high diagnostic performance for bone marrow abnormalities and low-volume bone lesions, as well as allowing monitoring by minimizing radiation exposure and the need for contrast agents. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Newer imaging techniques need to be validated in prospective clinical trials assessing the SMM to multiple myeloma transition, with the aim of enabling appropriate management decisions. Efforts are also needed to improve the costs and availability of whole-body MRI and/or FDG PET/CT, in order to facilitate their widespread adoption as first-line detection modalities. Future clinical trials of therapeutic agents using earlier detection strategies will have to be carefully designed and take into consideration the risk of lead-time and length-time biases, which might falsely demonstrate longer overall survival. The English full text version of this article is available at SpringerLink (under "Supplemental").

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24927659     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-014-2694-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  55 in total

1.  Lead time gained by diagnostic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  G B Hutchison; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The prognostic value of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose bone marrow uptake in patients with recent diagnosis of multiple myeloma: a comparative study with Tc-99m sestamibi.

Authors:  Massimo Castellani; Marco Carletto; Luca Baldini; Rossella Calori; Virgilio Longari; Davide Soligo; Luca Dellavedova; Paolo Gerundini
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.794

3.  Consensus recommendations for standard investigative workup: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 3.

Authors:  Meletios Dimopoulos; Robert Kyle; Jean-Paul Fermand; S Vincent Rajkumar; Jesus San Miguel; Asher Chanan-Khan; Heinz Ludwig; Douglas Joshua; Jayesh Mehta; Morie Gertz; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Meral Beksaç; Kenneth C Anderson; Philippe Moreau; Seema Singhal; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Mario Boccadoro; Shaji Kumar; Sergio Giralt; Nikhil C Munshi; Sundar Jagannath
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Current concepts in the evaluation of multiple myeloma with MR imaging and FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Christopher J Hanrahan; Carl R Christensen; Julia R Crim
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Comparison of imaging protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in overweight patients: optimizing scan duration versus administered dose.

Authors:  Yoko Masuda; Chisato Kondo; Yuka Matsuo; Masataka Uetani; Kiyoko Kusakabe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Sonja Buhmann; Christoph Becker; Stefan Oswald Schoenberg; Nicola Lang; Reiner Bartl; Maximilian Ferdinand Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: importance of whole-body versus spinal MR imaging.

Authors:  Tobias Bäuerle; Jens Hillengass; Kerstin Fechtner; Christian M Zechmann; Lars Grenacher; Thomas M Moehler; Heiss Christiane; Barbara Wagner-Gund; Kai Neben; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Accuracy of whole-body low-dose multidetector CT (WBLDCT) versus skeletal survey in the detection of myelomatous lesions, and correlation of disease distribution with whole-body MRI (WBMRI).

Authors:  T G Gleeson; J Moriarty; C P Shortt; J P Gleeson; P Fitzpatrick; B Byrne; J McHugh; M O'Connell; P O'Gorman; S J Eustace
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Does the novel integrated PET/MRI offer the same diagnostic performance as PET/CT for oncological indications?

Authors:  Jiahe Tian; Liping Fu; Dayi Yin; Jinming Zhang; Yingmao Chen; Ningyu An; Baixuan Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Shall we treat smoldering multiple myeloma in the near future?

Authors:  Ola Landgren
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

2.  Bone marrow abnormalities and early bone lesions in multiple myeloma and its precursor disease: a prospective study using functional and morphologic imaging.

Authors:  Manisha Bhutani; Baris Turkbey; Esther Tan; Neha Korde; Mary Kwok; Elisabet E Manasanch; Nishant Tageja; Sham Mailankody; Mark Roschewski; Marcia Mulquin; Ashley Carpenter; Elizabeth Lamping; Alex R Minter; Brendan M Weiss; Esther Mena; Liza Lindenberg; Katherine R Calvo; Irina Maric; Saad Z Usmani; Peter L Choyke; Karen Kurdziel; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2016-04-07

3.  How I treat smoldering multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Irene M Ghobrial; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Minimal residual disease analysis in myeloma - when, why and where.

Authors:  Uday Yanamandra; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2017-10-11

5.  The road to cure in multiple myeloma starts with smoldering disease.

Authors:  Karma Z Salem; Irene M Ghobrial
Journal:  Expert Opin Orphan Drugs       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 0.694

6.  Target therapy of multiple myeloma by PTX-NPs and ABCG2 antibody in a mouse xenograft model.

Authors:  Cuiping Yang; Fei Xiong; Jun Dou; Jun Xue; Xi Zhan; Fangfang Shi; Miao Li; Songyan Wu; Shouhua Luo; Tianzhu Zhang; Yu Zhang; Ji Ming; Ning Gu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-29

Review 7.  Imaging for Plasma Cell Dyscrasias: What, When, and How?

Authors:  Amrita Guha; Antariksh Vijan; Ujjwal Agarwal; Jayant Sastri Goda; Abhishek Mahajan; Nitin Shetty; Navin Khattry
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.